Motion Cadence
We've heard a lot from forum members claiming to see stark differences between cameras in the way they render motion, so this thread is for all those who wish to post comparisons. I'll start things off with a comparison between an $800 smartphone and a $50,000 cinema camera. I believe the two cameras were both set at 4K UHD 24p. It would of course be best if the posted videos were all shot at 24p.
Edit: Side-by-side tests only please!
@Oliver Daniel, just a number of points:
The days in which cameras shot fake progressive video (by firmware-deinterlacing an interlaced camera signal) are long gone. Those are leftovers from SDTV/SD video/CRT times when progressive scan video and tv standards didn't even officially exist.
One cannot judge the motion rendering quality of 24p video unless one has a perfect 24p playback chain where (a) the software video player, (b) the graphics card and (c) the monitor actually play