Jump to content

Zeiss Jenna p6 lenses


Lucian
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've taken an interest in these lenses after numerous mentions from the knowledgeable Andy lee and and Sean, and the fact that p.t anderson used them to shoot part of the insanely gorgeous "the master". I've done a lot of research but still can't quite answer all my questions.

 

So far I have gathered: the massive, zebra striped, 'medium format' p6 mount lenses are the ones to go for. Confusingly medium format lenses are larger than 35mm lenses. Due to their size they let in a lot more light, so an f4 is more like an f2.

 

So my remaining questions are:

 

1) would these work well with speed boosters on smaller s16 sensor cameras?

 

2) additionally would they be usable with the iscorama 36? my thinking is not really as they have enormous front threads(80mm +), and the isco rear thread is 49m. Catastrophic increase in vignette seems probable.

 

3) Even if they were usable with the isco, wouldn't the additional light let in from the large front element be negated because you are stepping down massively to attach to the anamorphic?

 

Thank you in advance for any wisdoms!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Due to their size they let in a lot more light, so an f4 is more like an f2.

 

That's not true. A fullframe lens doesn't let more light into a micro four thirds camera either. Can't beat physics. F4 = F4, no matter what sensor size. Just the field of view changes.

 

Also, The Master was shot on 65mm film with a Panavision 65 HR

Shooting with medium format lenses on a smaller sensor (fullframe or smaller) is not going to give the same effect.

 

Although according to imdb they also used 35mm (Panavision Millenium XL2) with the Zeiss Jena lenses you mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re the amount of light, i'm sure you are right that the fstop doesn't magically change, but here is a great write up on theses lenses by a dp, he shows a side by side comparison of a 50mm nikon f41.4 wide open and a Jenna f4 wide open and the amount of light is similar. So there must be something to his statement "When you look at the numbers, they don´t seem to be real fast, but don´t be fooled. Because of the huge diameter of those beasts they are almost twice as fast as the numbers suggest.

 

 

Yes, it was the 35mm portions of the master these lenses were used for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a bunch od these lenses they are Pentacon 6 mount (P6)

 

so to use a speedbooster you will need an adaptor from P6 to what ever mount your speedbooster is

 

Yes I have used my Schneider anamorphics on the Carl Zeiss 80mm f2.8 Biometar it has a 67mm front so works will with the Schneider that has a 70.6mm rear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re the amount of light, i'm sure you are right that the fstop doesn't magically change, but here is a great write up on theses lenses by a dp, he shows a side by side comparison of a 50mm nikon f41.4 wide open and a Jenna f4 wide open and the amount of light is similar. So there must be something to his statement "When you look at the numbers, they don´t seem to be real fast, but don´t be fooled. Because of the huge diameter of those beasts they are almost twice as fast as the numbers suggest.

 

Sadly the comparison images seem to be gone. Anyway, it is simply impossible. That DP can't beat physics either. Yes, they gather more light, but they distribute it to a bigger image circle because they have to cover medium format film. So you will loose that light. If there would be some kind of speed booster for medium format, you could bundle that light onto a full frame sensor and actually win an F-stop.

 

On the other hand, a 50mm 1.4 on a full frame camera has a lot of light fall of in the covers (vignetting). A medium format lens on a fullframe sensor wont have much light fall off wide open because you are only using the middle of the image circle (which is the brightest). So maybe that's the difference he's seeing. Claiming f/4 is like f/2, that is a two stop difference. A f/1.4 lens might have close to 2 stops light fall of in the corners, so there you'll probably see a difference, but that's gonna be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are likely right about the technical aspect, but  seeing the pictures comparing the amount of light was very similar on the 50m f1.4 vs the 50mm medium format lens at f/4 to my eye. So unless the images are fake, there is something to his statement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wide open, an 80mm f2.8 medium format lens will transmit more light onto a full frame sensor than a full frame lens of the same aperture/focal length.  almost all full frame lenses show vignette wide open on full frame, but the vignette on the medium format image circle is cropped away when used on full frame so the illumination is more uniform.

 

in the centre of the frame you will see exactly the same exposure, but the edges will be different by a stop or more.

 

Edge image quality will also be worlds apart - the medium format lenses delivering better quality due to being used within their sweet spot.

 

I use Hasselblad and Schneider medium format lenses on the sony A7R because I often like to position the subject at the edge of the frame, while keeping the lens wide open.  Only with the medium format lenses do you get really good results at 36mpx at the edges when the lens is wide open.

 

regarding iscorama use on medium format, you'll only see light loss and related issues from step rings if you use them on medium format sensors.  the crop factor negates any adverse effects.

 

finally, As i have said a few times, medium format lenses only tend to deliver 'creative' looking images when on big sensors/film surfaces.  when on smaller sensors you loose the aesthetic benefits such as that awesome wide fov and shallow dof obtained by a longer lens delivering wider fov due to the bigger imaging area (80mm on medium format = 50mm on full frame).   

 

The main argument against using medium format lenses is that some will say they are not as capable at delivering a fine enough resolution in 'line pairs/mm'. - due to not being designed to compress all the information into such a small area.  I know for a fact that my schneiders out perform my hasselblads drastically in terms of resolution when used on full frame, 36mpx.  Once on medium format imaging areas this difference is less noticable.

 

 

It is worth reading up on lens talk in the view camera / bellows type technical camera user forums since this subject is easier to discuss in the domain of 8x10" frames!   Schneider make a range of 'digitar' view camera lenses which aim to address this issue by delivering way more line pairs per millimeter than typicakl view camera lenses - which would suggest there milage in this discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are likely right about the technical aspect, but  seeing the pictures comparing the amount of light was very similar on the 50m f1.4 vs the 50mm medium format lens at f/4 to my eye. So unless the images are fake, there is something to his statement...

 

Saw the images. The Nikon is definitely brighter. Make crop of the middle and you'll see a big difference. It doesn't look like 3 stops brighter (it should be: f/4 > 2.8 > 2 > 1.4). It's hard to say from one test image, without the necessary parameters. Was the shutter speed / iso exactly the same? was the light from outside constant?

 

I agree with Rich, a MF lens will transmit more light onto the sensor, but that only changes the corner brightness. Anyway, would love to be proven wrong with a proper test :)

 

Btw, MF lenses don't come with fast apertures. So yes, if you get the 50mm f/4 Flektogon and use it wide open on a fullframe dslr, it won't vignette. But a 'normal' 50mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 won't vignette either at f/4. Same goes for 80mm's... A 85mm 1.4/1.8 doesn't vignette much when stopped down to 2.8.

 

Anyway, not saying you should not go for these lenses, but you shouldn't be doing it for the brightness...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brilliant, thank you for the detailed explanation Rich! 

 

with x.0.74 speedbooster a s16 sensor would effectively be about aps-c, but it sounds like the magic is lost on anything smaller than full frame.

 

I may have to give a 80mm biometar a go at some point anyway out of curiosity :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't beat physics. F4 = F4, no matter what sensor size. Just the field of view changes.

 

A couple of points:

- the same f-stop on every lens of the same focal length won't necessarily transmit the same amount light to the focal plane, which is why we have T-stops -- they account for the light "Transmission" factor;

- the field of view doesn't change from one lens to the next if the (effective) focal length remains the same (barring any condensing optics behind the aperture, such as a speed booster).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with x.0.74 speedbooster a s16 sensor would effectively be about aps-c, 

 

 

If you're boosted up to being effectively APS-C then you're in the range of the 35mm portions of The Master.  As these were chosen specifically for their ability to cut well with the 65mm portions of the film that's "interesting" enough for my money.  That's plenty "magic".

 

That film is tangible enough proof that not all is lost when going smaller than full frame.  PT Anderson and his DP tested literally dozens upon dozens of lenses, access to anything and everything, and this was the selection made for cutting between formats without jarring moments.  There was no portion of the film that didn't look amazing and without having previously read specific references to what scene might have been shot with what format nobody here can either say what is what or that the proof isn't in the pudding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm well it sounds like i'm definitely going to have to try for myself.

 

Agreed the entire film looked spectacular, as did his "there will be blood", which I believe was shot on panavision anamorphics for the most part. No harm in trying to rig up a combined poor mans version with an isco and biometar...  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do the pentacon 6 lenses compare to other medium format lenses? For example with pentax 67 lenses.

I compared some pentax 67 lenses to some nikon lenses on a D3 and they had less resolution less contrast (I only have the latest versions) and had some strange colored cromatic aberrations.

I haven't bought any pentacon stuff because the cameras are a mess and I don't like the idea of thorium (call me stupid).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the 50mm and 80mm and love them both.  I would really like to get the 120mm and 180mm as I am getting more into the aesthetic of longer focal lengths for ordinary shots.  I currently use them with adapters on a t3i but I've been looking into switching over to a m43 camera, most likely the gh4 or a blackmagic.  However, with the crop of a m43 camera, these lenses would be VERY long.  I'm not opposed to the idea but having a speed booster for them would be pretty neat.

 

I was under the impression that you could only use the mount-specific lenses with the speedboosters, only being able to use c/y glass with the c/y booster, so no putting a c/y adapter on a nikon lens and then onto the c/y speedbooster for example.  Is this actually possible?

 

For instance if I had a p6 to nikon mount adapter, could I then use them on the nikon speedbooster?  

 

Thanks for the help 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...