TomTheDP Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 1 hour ago, TheBoogieKnight said: Some YT tests of the R5 and R6 found the maximum under CLOG was 11 usable stops. The S1 if I remember rightly using the same parameters was 12.7 stops so a massive difference. The R5 does have the advantage of RAW and while there's actually less stops of usable DR, with noise reduction you'll almost certainly get more than you can out of CLOG although I haven't seen any tests investigating how much more. I saw a comparison of R5 raw and the zcam F6 Prores and dynamic range seemed the same. Probably similar with the S1 as the z cam uses the same sensor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 From cine 5d test around 10.8 stops in CLOG and around 12 in RAW. CLOG3 if it will ever ship should be similar to RAW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 I’m hoping to see clog3 as well and something in the mid to high 11 stop range of DR in that mode. The cineD test said there was perhaps 1-2 stops recoverable in RAW with some clever noise reduction in post so the RAW range is something like 11-13 stops. Clog3 favors highlights so perhaps the difference won’t be so much compared to clog1. If they do something clever with the H265 encoding to preserve detail in the shadows then maybe we will see a 1 stop improvement. We shall see. The Sony sensors are definitely better in the DR department on paper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 In theory CLog2 will give you more DR and based on C series test it gives a bit more DR than RAW mostly due to NR. But not so sure CLog2 will come. But happy to take CLog3.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Romero 2 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 15 hours ago, TheBoogieKnight said: Some YT tests of the R5 and R6 found the maximum under CLOG was 11 usable stops. The S1 if I remember rightly using the same parameters was 12.7 stops so a massive difference. The R5 does have the advantage of RAW and while there's actually less stops of usable DR, with noise reduction you'll almost certainly get more than you can out of CLOG although I haven't seen any tests investigating how much more. Thank you!!! Darn, for what I do do, that extra stop and 2/3rds would reduction in DR would be significant. But as for 4K 60p on the R6, then it does have a minimal crop (and not the 1.5X crop I thought I heard somewhere???) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 filmmakereu 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 13 hours ago, Emanuel said: 4k 120fps is not different than 4k 30fps as is conformed. My gaming notebook can play both realtime ... (all done in the CPU). The challenge comes when you want to conform it back to 120fps as you want to have speed ramp or just no slow motion from one section then is a no go. What I do a generate optimize media just for that section. The above solution seem a bit ridiculous then is better to batch convert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmmakereu Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 1 hour ago, gt3rs said: 4k 120fps is not different than 4k 30fps as is conformed. My gaming notebook can play both realtime ... (all done in the CPU). The challenge comes when you want to conform it back to 120fps as you want to have speed ramp or just no slow motion from one section then is a no go. What I do a generate optimize media just for that section. The above solution seem a bit ridiculous then is better to batch convert. Please elaborate then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBoogieKnight Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 Have there been any tests yet of image quality and DR using RAW and Neat NR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 I did sell one of my 512 GB SanDisk and brought a Delkin 2 TB for 880 usd. So far so good, I used a few times for over 1 TB each of 8k RAW and 4k 120fps 10bit with no issue at all. 8k RAW screen grab, 24mm at 2.8, Godox VL-200 Video Hummus, ntblowz and Juank 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 7 hours ago, gt3rs said: I did sell one of my 512 GB SanDisk and brought a Delkin 2 TB for 880 usd. So far so good, I used a few times for over 1 TB each of 8k RAW and 4k 120fps 10bit with no issue at all. 8k RAW screen grab, 24mm at 2.8, Godox VL-200 nice! Are you using the 8K mode as a high frame rate capture mode for photos? So Delkin CFX Type B is good for 8K RAW. Any slow down in startup times? Currently I have a 256GB Angelbird but I’ve heard the bigger capacity Angelbird cards increase camera boot times for some reason. Might have to take a look at the 2TB Delkin. So far my biggest annoyance is the custom profile doesn’t save the active card slot setting so when switching custom profiles, say 4K 24p to SD to 4K 120p it gives a warning about cant record to SD. I then have to use the quick menu to manual switch slots. Worse when I switch back it just stays on CFExpress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted January 11, 2021 Share Posted January 11, 2021 On 1/9/2021 at 3:12 AM, Video Hummus said: nice! Are you using the 8K mode as a high frame rate capture mode for photos? So Delkin CFX Type B is good for 8K RAW. Any slow down in startup times? Currently I have a 256GB Angelbird but I’ve heard the bigger capacity Angelbird cards increase camera boot times for some reason. The Delkin 2 TB does not slow down the startup. Startup is basically immediate as with the SandDisk 512 GB. I only use CFExpress so I did not incur on the active slot issue... For the posted frame goal was both video and photo. With sports you can get away with higher shutter speed so you get both in one take. Advantage of using continuous light is that you can get the perfect frame either at 20fps or 30fps if doing video (so no need to do multiple try for the same trick that they hate), disadvantage is that they are way less powerful than strobes, only ok for late afternoon and no sun.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpfilmz Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 My R5 arrived yesterday and I'll be doing some Anti YouTuber style test against a MAVO LF, EOS R and Pocket 4K. Initial lowlight test the EOSR + speedbooster preforms better than the R5. Also, I don't know why YouTubers aren't mentioning how good the 8k 8bit IPB is and how easy it is to work with. smh....You DON'T have to shoot EVERYTHING in RAW, 10bit or Clog(8bit variant would be nice). I can record 8k 8bit IPB to a Prograde Gold SD card without issues. Emanuel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
independent Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 Well it depends on what you want or your tolerances are. If you want max image quality, the r5’s 8k raw is arguably among the best for any camera. The dynamic range figures have to be contextualized with NR. If you want great useable dynamic range straight out of the camera, the c70 is great. The R5 8k raw requires work in post, but that’s any raw camera. With some NR its DR and high ISO end up being quite competitive or even better than the A7s iii. But the 8k raw’s detail and color are superior to anything under $15k. Video Hummus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 On 1/19/2021 at 3:30 PM, independent said: But the 8k raw’s detail and color are superior to anything under $15k. While a bold statement, its 8K RAW certainly can punch above its weight class, so to speak. Pretty good for a non-video 8K video camera that people aren't buying for video...🤔 jpfilmz and plucas 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomTheDP Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 On 12/30/2020 at 6:50 PM, TheBoogieKnight said: Have there been any tests yet of image quality and DR using RAW and Neat NR? There is a test floating about comparing R5 Raw to the Z Cam F6 and Panasonic S1H. The R5 seemed about the same as both cameras in the dynamic range department. They just need CLOG2 or 3 in the 10 bit modes to get the most out of the sensor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntblowz Posted January 21, 2021 Author Share Posted January 21, 2021 The new update will be coming next month... to counter the new Sony release? https://www.canonrumors.com/the-next-canon-eos-r5-firmware-update-is-coming-next-month-cr2/ zerocool22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerocool22 Posted January 21, 2021 Share Posted January 21, 2021 1 hour ago, ntblowz said: The new update will be coming next month... to counter the new Sony release? https://www.canonrumors.com/the-next-canon-eos-r5-firmware-update-is-coming-next-month-cr2/ Hope this is true. Then I only have to wait on a amd processor that can smoothly edit this footage and then I might get one + the price will already have dropped (or at least used). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plucas Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 5.1K Canon RAW Light would be welcome for the crop mode, especially in 50/60p. Rob6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 On 1/21/2021 at 3:41 PM, zerocool22 said: Hope this is true. Then I only have to wait on a amd processor that can smoothly edit this footage and then I might get one + the price will already have dropped (or at least used). The CR2 "rumor" rating is worrisome, along with words from the head of Canon's imaging division. This camera needs Clog3 with real world improvements in DR in 4K modes to stay more competitive. We already kinda get CLOG2 in 8K RAW mode. 18 hours ago, plucas said: 5.1K Canon RAW Light would be welcome for the crop mode, especially in 50/60p. This would be awesome but I highly doubt it. It will be interesting to see what they do with the rumored R1 1DX replacement. Latest rumors is it has a 45MP+ sensor and will shoot 8K. Sony as well with their A9III. I guess high MP are coming to the sports cameras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.