Jump to content

Removing lens coatings - Anyone tried it?


Inazuma
 Share

Recommended Posts

I really dislike the clinical rendering of modern lenses. I love the flares you get from old lenses, such as this taken with a Minolta 28mm f3.5 (not my photo). 

upfqtte17t331.thumb.jpg.d36db9f737e9a6ccfcde288834be7bfd.jpg

Modern lenses are convenient though for their autofocus and EXIF data. Has anyone here ever tried to remove the coating from their lens or has any tips on how to do so? What chemicals or tools would you use? Would removing the coating from the front element be sufficient to create the shape of the aperture blades as in the above picture, or would I have to go for the rear element and the internal elements too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Haven't tried it, but if you can find the lens optical diagram for a specific lens then that might show which lens elements have coatings on them.

My guess would be that there would be coatings on the inside as the flare above would be caused by light bouncing back and forth between lens elements inside the lens.  That's why you often introduce reflections when you put on a filter - the light goes through the filter then reflects off the front element of the lens then reflects off the back of the filter then goes through the lens to the sensor.

Can you buy flaring filters for these kinds of flares?  Does anyone know?

You'd have to get two curved elements with a gap between them, perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cooke do this with their front element, Sigma Classic is the same idea but I think every element and there's probably some coating, probably not entirely removed:

This doesn't work that well for me because the design is so complex it looks modern and the flares look weird. 

I think it would work but it might not give exactly the result you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2020 at 4:53 AM, Inazuma said:

Modern lenses are convenient though for their autofocus and EXIF data.

I guess that's a big reason why I enjoy vintage lenses.  They certainly offer a more filmic look, and I've never really ever cared about autofocus or EXIF.  1970's FD's are pretty good to take the edge of the "video" aesthetic. Plus, they're radioactive.  Fun with decaying isotopes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fuzzynormal said:

I guess that's a big reason why I enjoy vintage lenses.  They certainly offer a more filmic look, and I've never really ever cared about autofocus or EXIF.  1970's FD's are pretty good to take the edge of the "video" aesthetic. Plus, they're radioactive.  Fun with decaying isotopes.

please dont tell me you use it as a pillow 🤕

Maybe buy an old standard lens with fungus or something and have at it, with the same stuff they use to polish telescope mirrors. if you wanted to be technical about it you should probably make a lap so that you dont change the lens shape. do one lens element at a time, record and report findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really a fan of aftertastes. but hey if it works for you....😉

I have however made a (lowish) bid on a pentax m42 35mm with haze and fungus issues, if i win, i'll buy some cerium oxide and give one or more of the lens elements a polish  Since i already have a nice pentax m42 35mm i should be able to compare them quite easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mission is a go,  bought the lens, bought a 100 grams of cerium oxide. Should probably get some resin to make a lap or mould with, don't really want to change the lens shape. Probably will "borrow" some half used grinding pads from the old factory next time i go past.  Spent 13 years in the stone industry running bridge saws and cnc's although i think i have done about half a days work in the wet bay polishing a couple of jobs. Ebay thinks the lens should be here by september, Maybe we'll see some results before xmas 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

@leslie Any luck on that polishing? I'm trying to clean the inside (flat) of a rear element from a Mamiya-6 with the Olympus Zuiko 75mm f/3.5 lens from 1959. I've tried cerium oxide, hydrogen peroxide and ammonia, but no luck yet... in fact, the blemishes from the fungus seem more apparent. Got any tips?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleaning it probably makes it more obvious, bit like caustics in a pool.

Sad to say its still on the to do list. You may need something a little rougher or abrasive at the start. Cerium is more like the final polishing step i believe. In the stone industry we used different grades of diamond impregnated pads for a polish 50, 100, 200, 400, 800  1500 and a 3000. never worked with glass only stone. Use water lots of water, glass and silica and lens coatings are things you dont want in your lungs. Maybe a mask as well.

Different granites or marbles required some or all of the steps with glass you'd want to do each step and clean, inspect then move on to the next grade of  pad until you got to cerium. You'd have to be meticulous in your cleaning one grain from the previous pad on an optical surface would undo all your hard work.

The other thing i would do is watch a few telescope mirror making utubes. I wouldn't try polishing a lens  with out making a lap for that lens first. Else you'll change the shape of the lens too easily. Which might take the edge of the digital look but would also introduce all sorts of other interesting optical effects. 

Going down this path and you'll learn a bunch of new skills. It will be time consuming polishing stone or glass isnt a quick fix, more a labour of love. Especially since your dealing with curves, Its all doable but it will require some dedicated effort.  

Which is why i bought a really cheap prime lens to start with, but thats as far i have got so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2022 at 12:41 PM, Donald said:

@leslie Any luck on that polishing? I'm trying to clean the inside (flat) of a rear element from a Mamiya-6 with the Olympus Zuiko 75mm f/3.5 lens from 1959. I've tried cerium oxide, hydrogen peroxide and ammonia, but no luck yet... in fact, the blemishes from the fungus seem more apparent. Got any tips?

 

i reread your post. since you have said its a flat side. It should be an easier job. Although you'd still need to learn how to polish an optically flat surface from some telescope making forum. There's flat and then there's optically flat.

There's also the fact that the coating cant be too thick. however you'd still need some rougher abrasives to remove the coatings and then proceed on to polishing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a website with lots of examples of Cooke's that are coated, uncoated front lens element and uncoated front and rear lens elements in side by side comparison shots.

http://www.cookeminirentals.com/uncoated-elements

I prefer the examples with coated lens elements, but I find nothing wrong with the look of a coated Cooke lens in the first place.

I think they way to go is to find a lens that flares by the nature of its design (which could incorporate less than ideal lens coatings and lead to lens flares as well), thus a vintage zoom lens may be just what the doctor ordered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...