Jump to content

Let's go 4K on the big screen at home for 1 grand and a half...


Emanuel
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, "True 4k", "Faux K" or even "4K-enhancement" are only terms...


This is also information you can pick up from any typical search:

(interesting post as note of this scribe here)  
https://www.projectorreviews.com/the-art-of-home-theater-projectors/fauxk-vs-4k-projectors-look-true-4k-4k-uhd-1080p-pixel-shifters/#comment-3475477844

(from six years ago!)

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?77171-REDray-Projector&p=1012303&viewfull=1#post1012303

(BTW, here's a link to the same topic discussed on this other forum: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?165342-4K-projection-home-for-1-grand-and-a-half-Funny-times-Thanks-Jim!-(E-))

http://4k.com/news/optomas-newest-4k-hdr-projector-is-first-ever-to-sport-amazon-alexa-23018/

"As for the UHD51A’s resolution, it’s not true native 4K of the type you’d get from one of Sony’s much more expensive models, but the UHD51A does deliver a high quality pixel shift upscaling engine for taking native 4K video inputs from any source (or video in lesser resolutions) and upscaling them to a simulated ultra HD resolution that does look sharper than native 1080p HD. We saw this technology at work in other Optoma projectors we’ve reviewed and we can safely say that it works exceptionally at simulating 4K video quality. This aside, the HDR support for high dynamic range movies or programming is what will really deliver the goods, more than a minor difference between native 4K and upscaled 4K picture resolution."

And here's one from an usual suspect:
https://www.projectorreviews.com/benq/benq-ht2550-at-1499-the-most-affordable-4k-uhd-projector-yet-first-look/

Not exactly OT but, here's some food for thought (actually already referred by our Jon @jonpais along this thread):
https://petapixel.com/2017/11/18/testing-sonys-new-pixel-shift-feature-a7r-iii/

17 hours ago, Orangenz said:

My BenQ projector broke down after only a couple of years. Very disappointing quality. Ballast malfunctioning. 

Probably only bad luck, mate?! Since my native 1024x768 PB6200 has worked without flaws from 2004 (!) on, for 14 years now... (time enough for a resolution update BTW :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

I’ve got no problem with how they achieve 4K, but apparently it’s no better than the 1080p projector it’s compared to. The real news is the low cost.

Still, unless you’re projecting a 120” image, I don’t see the value in a projector. And then you also have to consider room size, the cost of a screen, and possibly a sound system. An OLED display will deliver far superior image quality if 55” or 65” is enough. I don’t believe the BenQ could hold a candle to the similarly priced LG C7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jonpais said:

I’ve got no problem with how they achieve 4K, but apparently it’s no better than the 1080p projector it’s compared to. The real news is the low cost.

Have you read those links yet, Jon? Some reviewers add no similar priced 1080p they compared to actually matches it... :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy in the video you shared, the majestic fellow, compares it to a 1080p projector and it’s not as sharp. All that aside, weak black levels is enough to kill it for me. But for those looking for a high quality, low priced unit, I suppose it’s enough. Do you own a projector or an OLED TV?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/2947392-benq-ht2550-4k-review-coming-very-soon-2.html#post55480932

25 minutes ago, jonpais said:

The guy in the video you shared, the majestic fellow, compares it to a 1080p projector and it’s not as sharp. All that aside, weak black levels is enough to kill it for me. But for those looking for a high quality, low priced unit, I suppose it’s enough. Do you own a projector or an OLED TV?

I know black levels on OLED TV can't be compared to : ) Neither the lower price range of this new entry as you accurately concurred ;-)

BTW, Optoma UHD60 the reviewer compares to is slightly sharper but offers the same UHD output instead :-)

He adds a different scope as far as color rendering concerns, though:

"One thing that I want to mention here that I didn't mention in the review is that the HDR performance of this projector is better than the UHD60 when the HDR mode is activated. The colors are more vibrant and the image has more depth than it does on the Optoma. Just keep in mind that it looks best on a screen smaller than 120 inches."

(source:)

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/2947392-benq-ht2550-4k-review-coming-very-soon-2.html#post55480932

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

 

PS... 10,000 lumen?! What are you on?!

 

5 hours ago, User said:

Everyone talks about landing on the the moon, but nobody talks about landing on the sun.

The sun would have those 10k lumens he's lookin' for.

Why the hate on 10000 lumens? Its a fair and simple questin though. Not sure why it called for pun.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2018 at 6:05 PM, jonpais said:

@IronFilm that’s one impressive link!

I'm trying to burn up your bandwidth by having to download extra characters on the webpage. 

23 hours ago, zerocool22 said:

This is very Interesting! Any link to a tutorial?

No idea, it was just a wild thought I had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The funny is the fact the parade doesn't end there at 10,000 lumens... Take a look on this example here:

And the utmost is when the 10,000 lumens theory proves to be the spot number. If not, the difference from 10,000 to 20,000 should duplicate the impact. It simply doesn't at all. Interesting to say the least. @zerocool22 you got a home run here, pal (E :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Emanuel said:

 

And the utmost is when the 10,000 lumens theory proves to be the spot number. If not, the difference from 10,000 to 20,000 should duplicate the impact. It simply doesn't at all. Interesting to say the least. @zerocool22 you got a home run here, pal (E :-)

Thanks, However buying and dragging 4 projectors along is a #][* though :D
So I will wait on an affordable 10K lumens projector. Or if someone can figure out a tutorial on that replacement part, I will give it a go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Bale forgot to grab a jacket for his head, those reviewers up there instead got them all ; -)

Another interesting comparison from TVS PRO:

These guys have much interesting comparative tests there, I invite everyone to take a look on their YT channel.

They are even known for their upgraded factory settings such as their Theo version:

https://www.tvspecialists.com/introducing-theo-z65-lite/

Here's an useful thread on topic:

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-digital-hi-end-projectors-3-000-usd-msrp/3086184-theo-z65-upgraded-optoma-uhz65-owners-thread.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cinegain said:

?!

I dunno... Low ANSI lumens to my taste : )

 

I bought this one (3000 ANSI lumens looks to me a minimum requirement):

https://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-TK800.htm

I am not unhappy at all but... pixel shifting is definitely cheating the parade. I got the proof today with a 4K sample, even though from h.265 @ low bitrate.

 

I'm eager to pay from native 2.7K instead. Looks like to me more reasonable and the recent Mavic Mini has made me think about...

https://www.techradar.com/reviews/optoma-uhz65-4k-laser-projector

https://www.techradar.com/reviews/optoma-uhd60-projector

 

EUR2500 + VAT for the Optoma Laser Phosphor (lamp type)

https://www.digitalprojection.com/emea/laser-phosphor-vs-lamp-projectors/

https://www.christielaserphosphor.com/media/Laser_Phosphor_Technology_Overview_FAQ.pdf

...or save 1 grand in the initial purchase is the only question?

 

Seems pretty clear to me, it's not the only premise to matter on here:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...