Jump to content

Pro camcorders? They're pointless creatively.


Andrew Reid
 Share

Recommended Posts

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
On 7/18/2017 at 5:01 AM, HockeyFan12 said:

I couldn't disagree much more strongly. That kind of rigging is taking away everything good about a dSLR and adding nothing but headaches. The only exposure aid I need is my 758 cine (heck, with zebras I don't even need the spot meter) and the only sound I would use from an on-camera mic would be for syncing dual system sound. Even with the best pre-amps in the world, your mic is still in the wrong place if it's on-camera. I can see the handle or a small cage being useful for balance, or maybe a loupe in daylight being helpful, but beyond that I don't see the point.

That said, not everyone agrees with me! If it works for you it works for you. As I mentioned before, s union AC I worked with did the same thing with a C300 when shooting a super bowl ad, rigging it out like crazy... and it is not designed to be rigged out. I asked what the point was when the ergonomics are great (for me) out of the box, but apparently the operator wanted a large 435-like form factor as it was what he was used to, having a film background. He wanted the thing to weigh 50 pounds.

But for me the smallest rig is the best one. If I wanted to weigh it down I'd tape a barbell to it. I do often get asked to use a matte box or something so clients and insecure actors will feel like the small camera is a real "cinema camera" but nothing makes me more irritated than this request. "Is that a real camera? Yes, are you a real actor? If so it'll show in your performance. If it's a real camera it'll show in the footage." But when I get that request it doesn't even reflect on the camera it reflects on me. If you think you know more about my job than I do, you've already lost confidence in me just by asking for a larger camera. Project your insecurities elsewhere. I'm doing my job well, worry about doing the same. Ugg... actors. So insecure it even wipes off on camera department.

I'm not saying I complete disagree, though. The Black Magic cameras, for instance, have such poor ergonomics that they need to be rigged up. Just offering a dissenting opinion. Each will have his or her own preferences. (And for mirrorless still cameras like the GH5 and A7S I do think the ergonomics are so poor that they often benefit from having a small cage and an HDMI clamp, but beyond that I don't see the point.)

I appreciate where you're coming from, but if you're working with a camera with no headphone jack to monitor audio (if even for a scratch track); no dual SD card slots in case one card fails; lousy focus peaking, and no way to check focus during playback, apart from the first frame of a clip, and on a tiny, low res screen at that - a monitor/recorder sure comes in handy. Nobody is talking about rigging anything out like crazy - there are many lightweight, affordable monitors and cages for small mirrorless cameras. To those who say, why not use a dedicated cinema camera, well, there's a world of difference in cost between something like an Ursa Mini or Canon C200 and a Sony a6500 or Panasonic Lumix GX85/G85. And even with a cage, monitor, microphone and follow focus, my G85 is ten times smaller than something like the Ursa Mini, and can always be broken down when I absolutely need discrete (though I find there's no truth whatsoever to the statement that a camera and cage is any less discrete than even a Sony RX10, in fact, I've already found that it's easier to shoot people on the street with a rigged out camera). BTW, if a paying client asked me to throw some rails and a matte box on, I'd do it in a flash, no questions asked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jonpais said:

I appreciate where you're coming from, but if you're working with a camera with no headphone jack to monitor audio (if even for a scratch track); no dual SD card slots in case one card fails; lousy focus peaking, and no way to check focus during playback, apart from the first frame of a clip, and on a tiny, low res screen at that - a monitor/recorder sure comes in handy. Nobody is talking about rigging anything out like crazy - there are many lightweight, affordable monitors and cages for small mirrorless cameras. To those who say, why not use a dedicated cinema camera, well, there's a world of difference in cost between something like an Ursa Mini or Canon C200 and a Sony a6500 or Panasonic Lumix GX85/G85. And even with a cage, monitor, microphone and follow focus, my G85 is ten times smaller than something like the Ursa Mini, and can always be broken down when I absolutely need discrete (though I find there's no truth whatsoever to the statement that a camera and cage is any less discrete than even a Sony RX10, in fact, I've already found that it's easier to shoot people on the street with a rigged out camera). BTW, if a paying client asked me to throw some rails and a matte box on, I'd do it in a flash, no questions asked. 

That's fair. 

I would do almost anything if I were paid enough. But the matte box thing is an insult. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...