anto Posted July 16, 2016 Share Posted July 16, 2016 I have to choose a cam for my personal project, short and film, 0 budget... these three cam are very different but each cam have something that interest me, and other lack xc10 -all in one. lens (i don't care it's fix 2.8-5.6), stabilizzazion, take and shot -4k 305 Mb 422, 10 bit with external recorder. c100 -true cinema camera, ND filter, battery life, double XLR, iso range -file very small, don't need NASA pc 5D MK III RAW 14 bit!!11!1!! (i try to grade some footage 14 bit raw, and went from an a7s all it's wooow) Dynamic range amazing I think raw came from 5d3 it's the best image i can get from a cinema camera under 5000€.... but the 5d has every unpractical things of the reflex. so I have been considering the c100 and xc10, unfurtunately c log on xc10 seams to me less flat to the other canon CC I don't want sony, I sold my A7S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kubrickian Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Get a used Panasonic GH2 and practice your craft until you reach 10,000 hours IronFilm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Why not BMD Micro Cinema Camera? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veraguth Posted July 18, 2016 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Go with the c100 and the 35mm f2 IS. Everything you need, really. Most people will not care about the dynamic range difference. And a 5D: you will later have to buy a rig, a xlr audio solution, expensive cards, nd filters, and have time to transcode everything. And also, consider an used c300. People made features with the beast, and they won the Palme d'Or. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.