Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bruno

Sony RX100: Getting the best video out of it...

Recommended Posts

The AdobeRGB version looks more contrasty to me, but you can also use a histogram to see the actual differences.

 

Screen%2520Shot%25202013-02-07%2520at%25

 

In case you're wondering, I'm using a browser plug-in written by a friend to show the histogram.  It works on almost every website except for Facebook, I think. Get it here for Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/image-histogram/kgefpfienchbbehcjnmbmogdigoedhaj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony Cameras
Good idea. I feel the difference is too subtle to be the difference between sRGB and Adobe1998 though, if you look at the kind of difference it should make.
 
My testing wasn't that consistent (it was five minutes at my desk between edits) so I think you can attribute the difference to that, realistically. It's probably just Rec709 space all round.
 
One chart here shows it's very subtle though, maybe it would explain the difference in the reds? Still, for my purposes I've concluded it's not worth worrying about, so I'll leave it on sRGB!
 
chromacity-all.jpghttp://www.fxguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/chromacity-all.jpg]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
on the subject of DRO. it appears to work best at iso200 from some experimentation I have done.


assuming you are exposing to avoid clipping of the sky, the shadow noise on darker areas boosted by DRO seems to be more prominent at iso100 than the shadow noise caused by DRO when iso is set to 200 with the lens aperture adjusted to match exposure of the sky.

This makes me think that base ISO of nex5n is actually 200 (as it was with the original nex-5 and nex-3), but is having some type of post exposure compensation to allow for the option of iso100. The processing is naturally going to cause some type of image degradation. This is likely the case with the rx100 too.

Maybe some one can look into this. If true it might be worth avoiding iso100 and starting at iso200 to avoid banding and other nasties. It is known that this is a main cause of banding/colour issues with the Canon 1DC when used at ISO lower than the actual Base iso of the sensor. Being that the previous nex models were base iso of 200 it seems funny sony would downgrade on the newer model.. rather than just applying some processing to offer a faux lower iso of 100.

Thoughts??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Haven't tested it myself, most people seem to agree it's 125 though, also that's what's mentioned in the manual.
Some people claim that the highest DR at 200 ISO only happen when shooting JPGs with noise reduction on, which would make the improvement a post effect kind of thing, and not a real improvement, was this the case with your tests?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have NR set to minimum and am talking in movie mode terms.

 

 

I am just adjusting my aperture to compensate for the difference in ISO.  It is just a lot less grainy in the shadows/darker areas (the areas boosted by DRO) when set to iso200.  Iso100 is significantly more grainy than iso200 in the DRO boosted areas.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw that, but I can't seem to set it when I am in video mode. I assume it's because I am not shooting in jpg. I would assume that the NR doesn't happen in video mode based on that, but I could be wrong. I would have to do some tests. Did you notice that it was doign NR in movie mode?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just adjusting my aperture to compensate for the difference in ISO.  It is just a lot less grainy in the shadows/darker areas (the areas boosted by DRO) when set to iso200.  Iso100 is significantly more grainy than iso200 in the DRO boosted areas.    

 

Did you try doing the same test with DRO off? Is it still noisier at 100 ISO?

 

Btw, 100 ISO (and 80 ISO) is being pushed in post, 125 ISO should be the base one, and therefore offer cleaner results, have you tried that one instead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you try doing the same test with DRO off? Is it still noisier at 100 ISO?

 

Btw, 100 ISO (and 80 ISO) is being pushed in post, 125 ISO should be the base one, and therefore offer cleaner results, have you tried that one instead?

 

without dro there doesnt seem to be a difference in noise between 100 and 200.  it's only when you go to iso100 with dro on that noise seems more prominent than at iso200.  PS.  this is on the nex5n, not rx100.  but since they share so many similarities with processing, etc I imagine these results will be similar on the rx100

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have different sensors though, so it's very possible that their base ISOs are different. In the RX100 ISOs 80 and 100 are not proper ISOs, they're even marked differently. It's definitely worth testing though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an ISO test.

These are all the ISO modes available during video mode.

125 is the cleanest, it's been mentioned in a few places that it's this camera's base ISO and it does look that way.

 

The only surprise here is that 400 ISO is actually less noisy than 200 ISO.

 

But overall, unless you push it really hard, the noise is barely visible before 3200 ISO.

 

ISO%20NOISE.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd say 400 is native probably. The fact that it has so little blue-channel noise (the biggest problem with current Sony sensors in my experience) is great to know, cheers for this test!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say 400 is native probably. The fact that it has so little blue-channel noise (the biggest problem with current Sony sensors in my experience) is great to know, cheers for this test!

 

I agree.  400 seems the best noise vs gain ratio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In that sense you could treat the RX100 like 400ISO Super 16 film, leave the ISO fixed for the most part and light to the sensitivity

 

The sensor is about that size!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a comparison between 125 and 400 ISO.

I pushed the 125 version one stop further than the 400 one, so they're equally bright when desaturated.

It's definitely a different noise structure, but I seriously don't know what to make of it.

125 does seem cleaner, and keep in mind that it's been pushed further than the 400 ISO side.

 

Looking at how good the 400 ISO version looks though, I wouldn't be surprised if it is indeed the camera's base ISO, but it does seem a bit high of an ISO for them to go with, on the other hand it could explain why this little sensor can do so well in low light. Also, if 400 ISO is in fact its base ISO, then they're doing a great job when pushing it to 125, much better than when pushing it to 200, which is somehow odd.

 

This article (and most others I found) also claims that the base ISO is 125.

 

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-rx100/sony-rx100A.HTM

 

ISO%20NOISE%20%28125%20vs%20400%29.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By newadam
      I have a great condition Sony FS5 that is a little less than a year old for sale. (I would rather not sale, but I am in between projects and the next one planned will require a very different setup than I use now.) It is in great condition, no drops, non smoking studio. The only problem in full disclosure is the small EVF on the back was bumped in the case a few months ago. It works fine, but the adjustment diopter gets stuck. Now honestly, I have NEVER used the little EVF. Too small for anything useful. You can adjust it and can see it fine. Otherwise, it is in great condition. 

      Sony FS5 Body and original box contents. new currently $4750

       For Sale at $3700 including PayPal and Shipping to the US.  
      Fs5 Body and factory box contents (U30 battery, charger, AC adapter, LCD display, Grip, Remote, Mic Holder, Eyecup, etc) 
      contact me through this forum or at ( newadam at mastersmedia . com )






    • By DaveAltizer
      For sale is a slightly used Canon SL2. I'm a reviewer on YouTube and bought this camera for a review. So if you buy this, you're getting a very lightly used camera. 

      The SL2 has all the modern features from Canon. Dual Pixel AF and Digic 7 processor. I love the small size of this camera. 

      If you have any questions at all, please don't hesitate to ask. 

      Thanks!




    • By Kevin Klopper
      I will be in London from Sept. 07 to Sept. 11. For in person exchange.
      1. Sony PXW FS5 (body) with paid raw option included Price: 3999 Euro / 3650 GBP
      2. Sony PXW FS5 (body) with paid raw option included wo BoxPrice: 3899 Euro / 3550 GBP
      3. CD ODYSSE 7Q PLUS WITH RAW Option + 2TB SSDs + Batteries Price: 900 Euro / 830 GBP
      4. CD ODYSSE 7Q PLUS WITH RAW Option + 2TB SSDs + Battery Price: 850Euro / 780 GBP
      5. SONY A7S MKII Price: 1600 Euro / 1500 GBP
      6. SONY E MOUNT 55MM 1.8 Price: 430 Euro / 400 GBP
      7. SONY E MOUNT 16-35 F4 Price: 600 Euro / 550 GBP
      8. SONY E MOUNT 10-18 F4 Price: 450 Euro / 415 GBP
      9. CANON EF 16-35 F2.8 L MKII Price: 500 Euro / 460 GBP
      10. CANON EF 100MM 2.8 L Price: 429 Euro / 399 GBP
      11. LAOWA 12MM F2.8 WIDE ANGEL LENS Price: 900 Euro / 830 GBP
      12. METABONES SPEEDBOOSTER EF TO E MOUNT ULTRA 0.71X (wo accessories) Price: 299 Euro / 280GBP
      13. METABONES SPEEDBOOSTER EF TO E MOUNT ULTRA 0.71X Price: 310 Euro / 290GBP
      14. METABONES ADAPTER EF TO E MOUNT (WO GLASS) Price: 220 Euro / 200 GBP
      15. ZOOM H6 Price: 220 Euro / 200 GBP
      16. CORSAIR VENGEANCE RAM 16GB 2400MHZ Price: 65 Euro / 60 GBP
      For questions call +357 96 08 20 25 or email [email protected] , its a Cyprus number but I will be in London from 07. Sep to 10. Sep for in person exchanges (available with same number). Cash and paypal accepted.
      Some work examples I have created with this system: www.kevklopper.com
      See dropbox link for all info (PDF in folders):
      http://bit.ly/2vGppax





    • By hmcindie
      We went out to test a DIY rainmachine on top of a tractor. Learned a ton of shit, like backlighting is a must for rain and that the 5d mark III can indeed get waterdamaged (cost me 380 euros to repair it). Also that igniters for explosions can also freak out when they are under water.
       
    • By Oliver Daniel
      Selling the FS5 with the FS-RAW update installed, plus factory accessories and 2 additional large capacity BP-U batteries.
       
      Included:
      Sony FS5 Camera Body
      Accessories such as Charger, Remote, CD, BP-U30 Battery.
      2 x BP-U90 Batteries (ExPro - last all day!)
      FS-RAW update
       
      Condition is great. There's a slight mark on top of the LCD and minor signs of use but nothing major that harms operation.
      Original monitor attachment changed to the superior one from SmallRig.
      Operation 12x10 hours.
      Price is £4399 + cost of shipping to anywhere in Europe.
      Bought from visuals.co.uk in the UK 10 months ago.
      Reason for sale is that I will be doing a different type of project this year where I'll be using small mirrorless cameras.
      I also have an immaculate Shogun Inferno Kit + 2 SSDs for sale at £1499.
      Message me if interested!













×