Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bruno

Sony RX100: Getting the best video out of it...

Recommended Posts

EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony Cameras

I wish that was possible, but I have never found a way to do that. I also wish we could somehow punch in zoom right before shooting a clip, but that is only possible on the other (non film) modes unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very satisfied with image quality for the camera it is. Make no mistakes though, this is not a 7D, this is a fragile little camera, if the lens decides to get stuck there's probably not much I'll be able to do about it on the spot, It'd be risky to use it even on a small production if have a team depending on it. The built in lens is great, especially at 28mm since it goes to 1.8, but more limited in longer focal lengths.

 

The dealing with menus also feels more fiddly than dealing with Canon menus, there are more confirmation screens, consumer level alerts, it's not as "mechanical" and direct as with a Canon, and the buttons are tiny, and pressing a button will most likely cause the camera to move...

 

Also, I never felt the sturdiness of a Canon 7D. I had no problem shooting under rain or snow with the 7D, I wouldn't even risk it with the RX100. There's also something about the Canon image quality that you just don't get, even if you get slightly more resolution with the RX100. 

 

But then again, these are all points that seemed obvious to me when I first got it, so no disappointment at all, it's an amazing pocket camera, and I'm thinking about shooting a small short with it, even considering all the risks.

 

Just the kind of feedback i was looking for - it is always great to hear real life experiences from someone who have used it mainly as a filmmaking tool. It does sound like a great little camera, despite its shortcomings. One can always hope for a faster lens at longer focal lenghts in the next version, but that update is proberly not just around the corner.   

 

Thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another addition:

 

As far as I can see, DRO only affects shadows, not highlights. Try blowing out a shot then upping the DRO. You'll notice the highlights stay the same, but the shadows come up with each setting.

 

What I've seen with my eyes here is also borne out by DP-Review's test:

 

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx100/11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see, DRO only affects shadows, not highlights. Try blowing out a shot then upping the DRO. You'll notice the highlights stay the same, but the shadows come up with each setting.

 

I actually noticed that, but their (vague) documentation seemed to say that it worked at both ends, thanks for clarifying!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still want to test a few more things, like color space for instance, most people seem to agree that adobeRGB will store more colors than sRGB, especially in compressed formats, it usually also works better for skin tones, but I still haven't gotten round to test that yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I had read that, but I think he's talking mostly about ready to print images, and looking for the opposite of what we are looking for.

 

For instance:

 

"sRGB is the world standard for digital images, printing and the Internet. So long as you haven't screwed with anything, you and the world are shooting in sRGB."

 

We're not looking at getting vibrant realistic colors, we're looking for a flat image that will give us more to work with in post, or at least I am! :)

 

"Adobe RGB squeezes colors into a smaller range (makes them duller) before recording them to your file."

 

This is a disadvantage for him, but an advantage to us, as it will give us a flatter image using and probably cram more information into the compressed codec.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I see what you're saying.

 

I figured it doesn't affect video though, just stills. Colour spaces in compressed video are usually Rec709 or Rec601.

 

So in Canon EOS original you have Rec601. oddly enough.

 

Since Sony RX100 video reads in Media Info as BluRay BD Video, I'm assuming the colour space is Rec709 Y,Cb,Cr, and unaffected by this sRGB/AdobeRGB 1998 setting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ Bruno.

 

This is what Shane Hulbut said in relation to setting up a 5Dmk2 for video (not the same camera, but still informative): 

"Now we go down to Color Space.  You have two color spaces.  You have sRGB or you have Adobe RGB.  I’ve found that Adobe RGB gives you the best skin tones out of this camera."

 

Thought it was interesting that he recommended using Adobe RGB & not sRGB.

 

The whole set up is explained here:

http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2012/07/hdslr-educational-series-for-cinema-episode-1-know-your-camera/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about the RX100 as I haven't tested this yet, but on the Canons the color space does make a difference in video.

Oddly enough you can't change the color space in video mode though, you have to do it in stills mode, but it will change the video's color space too!

 

I had seen that Hurlbut post, no idea if AdobeRGB has the same effect on the RX100, but most people do say it gives you a flatter image and crams more color information into the same space.

 

Regarding Color clipping I think it's REC709 yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like the way this conversation is going.  nice deep boundary pushing of the use of what are considered by a lot of people as simply 'point and shoots'.  

 

vimeo.com/46037571

 

this is interesting.  putting the nex5n (which has the same list of options as the rx100 in terms of profile tweeking) against the 550d, gh2 and d800

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It happened to be on my desk at the moment, so I've done a quick test. Stills from 1080/60p videos. I think they're as near as identical! Or if there is a difference I'm struggling to see it. Perhaps the reds seem a tiny bit darker/saturated in the Adobe ones, but I am looking for a difference, which can skew judgement. What do you think?

 

sRGB

SRGB_zpsb8890cab.png

 

Adobe 1998

ADOBE_zpsd9a164c0.png

 

EDIT:

 

Tried it with my hand for more complex tones. Pretty much the same again! (It's a slightly different angle hence the darker index finger, the greatest of all picture profiles: LIGHTING! ;) )

 

in sRGB:

2sRGBHAND_zps70b5fef9.png

 

in Adobe 1998:

2ADOBEHAND_zpsf772315a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It happened to be on my desk at the moment, so I've done a quick test. Stills from 1080/60p videos. I think they're as near as identical! Or if there is a difference I'm struggling to see it. Perhaps the reds seem a tiny bit darker/saturated in the Adobe ones, but I am looking for a difference, which can skew judgement. What do you think?

 

sRGB

SRGB_zpsb8890cab.png

 

Adobe 1998

ADOBE_zpsd9a164c0.png

 

EDIT:

 

Tried it with my hand for more complex tones. Pretty much the same again! (It's a slightly different angle hence the darker index finger, the greatest of all picture profiles: LIGHTING! ;) )

 

in sRGB:

2sRGBHAND_zps70b5fef9.png

 

in Adobe 1998:

2ADOBEHAND_zpsf772315a.png

adobeRGB looks less saturated/flatter from here.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah adobeRGB does seem to be slightly different (less saturated & flatter).

 

Looking at the reflection in the mug & looking through the bottle, it also seems to give the impression of producing slightly more detail.

 

But with the skin tones it appears to smooth out the blemishes, thus making it more uniform - but whether the detail comes back when you cc in post...?  

 

I could be wrong, but could using adobeRGB produce better detail in the shadows & less in the highlights?

 

gotta try this....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the test will be the classic "can you make one look like the other". It looks like a contrast shift to me more than a hugely different look. Now these differences have been mentioned I can see a subtle difference. The sRGB looks marginally flatter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone has a chart and an RX100 they could do a scientific test, I tend to do ones that look like the kind of thing I'll shoot! From that evidence here I think I'll stick with sRGB as the reds seems more squashed in Adobe. Looking at them as full 1080p (Photobucket downscaled them) there's even less difference. I'm thinking most of the change may have come from the Photobucket re-encoding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judging from these images I'd say the Color Space has no effect on the video mode :)

I put both images one on top of the other and I don't think there's any difference. There's a slight angle change which can make a big difference on reflective surfaces such as the mug, but overall I don't see any change in color at all, not the kind of difference you'd see between sRGB and AdobeRGB at least.

Might be worth shooting some stills too to see if the difference is more apparent, and then compare it to video footage of the same thing to find out which color space the camera is using on video mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By newadam
      I have a great condition Sony FS5 that is a little less than a year old for sale. (I would rather not sale, but I am in between projects and the next one planned will require a very different setup than I use now.) It is in great condition, no drops, non smoking studio. The only problem in full disclosure is the small EVF on the back was bumped in the case a few months ago. It works fine, but the adjustment diopter gets stuck. Now honestly, I have NEVER used the little EVF. Too small for anything useful. You can adjust it and can see it fine. Otherwise, it is in great condition. 

      Sony FS5 Body and original box contents. new currently $4750

       For Sale at $3700 including PayPal and Shipping to the US.  
      Fs5 Body and factory box contents (U30 battery, charger, AC adapter, LCD display, Grip, Remote, Mic Holder, Eyecup, etc) 
      contact me through this forum or at ( newadam at mastersmedia . com )






    • By DaveAltizer
      For sale is a slightly used Canon SL2. I'm a reviewer on YouTube and bought this camera for a review. So if you buy this, you're getting a very lightly used camera. 

      The SL2 has all the modern features from Canon. Dual Pixel AF and Digic 7 processor. I love the small size of this camera. 

      If you have any questions at all, please don't hesitate to ask. 

      Thanks!




    • By Kevin Klopper
      I will be in London from Sept. 07 to Sept. 11. For in person exchange.
      1. Sony PXW FS5 (body) with paid raw option included Price: 3999 Euro / 3650 GBP
      2. Sony PXW FS5 (body) with paid raw option included wo BoxPrice: 3899 Euro / 3550 GBP
      3. CD ODYSSE 7Q PLUS WITH RAW Option + 2TB SSDs + Batteries Price: 900 Euro / 830 GBP
      4. CD ODYSSE 7Q PLUS WITH RAW Option + 2TB SSDs + Battery Price: 850Euro / 780 GBP
      5. SONY A7S MKII Price: 1600 Euro / 1500 GBP
      6. SONY E MOUNT 55MM 1.8 Price: 430 Euro / 400 GBP
      7. SONY E MOUNT 16-35 F4 Price: 600 Euro / 550 GBP
      8. SONY E MOUNT 10-18 F4 Price: 450 Euro / 415 GBP
      9. CANON EF 16-35 F2.8 L MKII Price: 500 Euro / 460 GBP
      10. CANON EF 100MM 2.8 L Price: 429 Euro / 399 GBP
      11. LAOWA 12MM F2.8 WIDE ANGEL LENS Price: 900 Euro / 830 GBP
      12. METABONES SPEEDBOOSTER EF TO E MOUNT ULTRA 0.71X (wo accessories) Price: 299 Euro / 280GBP
      13. METABONES SPEEDBOOSTER EF TO E MOUNT ULTRA 0.71X Price: 310 Euro / 290GBP
      14. METABONES ADAPTER EF TO E MOUNT (WO GLASS) Price: 220 Euro / 200 GBP
      15. ZOOM H6 Price: 220 Euro / 200 GBP
      16. CORSAIR VENGEANCE RAM 16GB 2400MHZ Price: 65 Euro / 60 GBP
      For questions call +357 96 08 20 25 or email [email protected] , its a Cyprus number but I will be in London from 07. Sep to 10. Sep for in person exchanges (available with same number). Cash and paypal accepted.
      Some work examples I have created with this system: www.kevklopper.com
      See dropbox link for all info (PDF in folders):
      http://bit.ly/2vGppax





    • By hmcindie
      We went out to test a DIY rainmachine on top of a tractor. Learned a ton of shit, like backlighting is a must for rain and that the 5d mark III can indeed get waterdamaged (cost me 380 euros to repair it). Also that igniters for explosions can also freak out when they are under water.
       
    • By Oliver Daniel
      Selling the FS5 with the FS-RAW update installed, plus factory accessories and 2 additional large capacity BP-U batteries.
       
      Included:
      Sony FS5 Camera Body
      Accessories such as Charger, Remote, CD, BP-U30 Battery.
      2 x BP-U90 Batteries (ExPro - last all day!)
      FS-RAW update
       
      Condition is great. There's a slight mark on top of the LCD and minor signs of use but nothing major that harms operation.
      Original monitor attachment changed to the superior one from SmallRig.
      Operation 12x10 hours.
      Price is £4399 + cost of shipping to anywhere in Europe.
      Bought from visuals.co.uk in the UK 10 months ago.
      Reason for sale is that I will be doing a different type of project this year where I'll be using small mirrorless cameras.
      I also have an immaculate Shogun Inferno Kit + 2 SSDs for sale at £1499.
      Message me if interested!













×