amanieux Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 is the 2.5k from full sensor on nx500 downsampled from 6.5k or is it doing line/pixel skipping ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Am looking to sell my NX500, so I thought someone on here might be interested in a lightly used NX500 to use toward the hack. I could sell just the body, or for a little more I'll throw in some vintage lenses and adapters... I have a bunch, so if you're interested in the body plus lenses let me know and I will give you a list of the lenses I have. Pictures available upon request. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 what lenses do you have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Leaves Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Long time lurker, first time poster, NX500 owner. First off, thanks to the folks that know what they are doing. Y'all are really doing all of us a huge service, and it is greatly appreciated. I just tried Vasile's record limit trick with some initially disappointing results. I'm hoping that these are due to my SD card. I don't want this to come across as complaining, just what I've observed with my attempt. NX500 w/ Transcend 32GB SDHC Class 10 UHS-1 600x card (this one) I followed Vasile's directions. No problems there. When I hit record on any of the settings it initially will give a large number for total record time (for about a second) and then the number suddenly changes to a much lower value. Here are my results with different "Movie Quality" settings: FHD 24P - Quality Pro - At beginning record time reads "00:00/35791394:0" then one second goes by and it reads "00:01/09:30" FHD 24P - Quality HQ - Again, at beginning record time reads "00:00/35791394:0" then one second goes by and it reads "00:01/22:43" FHD 24P - Quality Normal - Again, at beginning record time reads "00:00/35791394:0" then one second goes by and it reads "00:01/43:37" The results for FHD 30P are exactly the same, and FHD 60P predictably produces lower total record times and also does the tease with the higher number appearing for the first second of recording. Also, I did let the record run a number of times and it did indeed stop recording at the 9:30, 22:43, and 43:37 marks. Is anyone else having similar results? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucabutera Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Wow! The Samsung nx1 bitrate is very grown! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 12 minutes ago, vaga said: what lenses do you have? I have some Minolta MD lenses. Some Pentax M, Some Sigma in FD mount. Some Canon FL, a couple Takumar, some vivitar M42, a couple Pentacon m42, Chinon m42, a Contax Zeiss Planar 50mm 1.7, an Olympus om 28mm f2 and 50mm 1.8, a Tokina 24-40 in OM mount and a Tokina RMC 25-50 in PK mount, etc, etc, etc... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMGJohn Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 3 hours ago, vasile said: http://***URL removed***/forums/post/57461650 By the way, I'd like to ask you all to NOT name the bitrate and let everyone download the file if they want to know it. It would be an interesting thing to see how long you can keep it under wraps and only discuss "around it" but without naming it explicitly. I have no way to enforce this [oops, I just realized I do :-) and you know it too] but I do ask you to play by this rule, at least until I am back. Sweet Jesus and Lord in Heaven, I wonder what happens when you do GammaDR with that stuff, because I tried screw around with the clip in post and imao the range, the range! I hope there is a way to use the MJPEG codec for 2160p as well in high bitrates, that would be sweet. vaga and Pavel Mašek 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 3 hours ago, vasile said: http://***URL removed***/forums/post/57461650 By the way, I'd like to ask you all to NOT name the bitrate and let everyone download the file if they want to know it. It would be an interesting thing to see how long you can keep it under wraps and only discuss "around it" but without naming it explicitly. I have no way to enforce this [oops, I just realized I do :-) and you know it too] but I do ask you to play by this rule, at least until I am back. Can't wait to try this myself. I have the UHS-II card if I can give it a go for testing. Pavel Mašek and SMGJohn 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 This file is taking me hours to download...can't wait to see it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSN Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 3 hours ago, vasile said: http://***URL removed***/forums/post/57461650 By the way, I'd like to ask you all to NOT name the bitrate and let everyone download the file if they want to know it. It would be an interesting thing to see how long you can keep it under wraps and only discuss "around it" but without naming it explicitly. I have no way to enforce this [oops, I just realized I do :-) and you know it too] but I do ask you to play by this rule, at least until I am back. Oh. My. God. You did it! :o Looks so awesome!! Premiere doesn´t like this clip Marco Tecno 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 @amanieux brings up an interesting question: If the 2560*1440 is downsampled from the entire sensor, shouldn't it take less work for the proessor do downsample to 4k instead? In which case, full sensor 4k may be possible. Otherwise, if 2560*1440 is lineskipping, is there any moire? Is there a way to lineskip 4k on the entire sensor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel Mašek Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 YESSS! Incredible! I am also surprise that playback is realtime in full resolution in Premiere (it was choppy but I had to move the file to SSD, then it was fine). (i7 3,2Ghz, SSD, Nvidia GTX960 with h265 support). I think it is not against Vasile's rules - here are just 2 images - default and graded. The shadows noise is very usable - my opinion: it is not fine noise, but look at that - default was completely black in shadows! Geoff CB, vaga, SMGJohn and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Petty outstanding. Curious of seeing what it could be done with gammaDR and Andrew's lut. vaga and Pavel Mašek 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bornmirri Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Just wanted to pop in and say I got the NX1 because of this thread and I might just pick up the NX500 as well. Amazing job from everyone here! Also, Vasile, took a look at the clip and that bit-rate is simply amazing, given it being hevc. Will throw teh monies at this. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Looks like pretty good highlight recovery too Pavel Mašek 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gine Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Is it possible to get 120FPS footage with higher bitrates ? That would be incredible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel Mašek Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Indeed it is still image from video so it does not show the "noise movement"...Maybe I pushed shadows too much but test it on your side and you will see. I think it is very useable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 34 minutes ago, Pavel Mašek said: YESSS! Incredible! I am also surprise that playback is realtime in full resolution in Premiere (it was choppy but I had to move the file to SSD, then it was fine). (i7 3,2Ghz, SSD, Nvidia GTX960 with h265 support). I think it is not against Vasile's rules - here are just 2 images - default and graded. The shadows noise is very usable - my opinion: it is not fine noise, but look at that - default was completely black in shadows. Did a similar test. Ridiculously over and under exposed. I'm astounded. Given the lighting source I'm guessing we are looking at 800 iso or higher. SMGJohn, Hanriverprod, Marco Tecno and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 I tried some basic adjustments in VLC and then screenshotted (I tried Resolve, but it crashed on my computer when it saw 4k footage). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucabutera Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.