Jump to content

ryne275

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ryne275

  1. Sony sent this camera to a bunch of shills who are afraid to bite the hand that feeds them. Salesmen in disguise. Sad. Overheating is clearly gonna be a big issue with the camera

  2. Max Yuryev says the A7 III (when compared to A7S 3) has more detail in 4K/24P thanks to its oversampling. But Gerald Undone is reporting the complete opposite. Who's right? Is Gerald shilling?

  3. 9 minutes ago, gt3rs said:

    Check the comparison.....4.2k oversampled vs 8k oversampled....

    Max confirms A73 4K is sharper, more detailed right here in his video: 

     

  4. The original Sony A7 is like $700//800 new. Not sure why you'd buy a phone camera over a full frame mirrorless. For video tho, sure, the iPhone destroys the original A7. But for photos? The A7 is your best bet

  5. 4 hours ago, Stryfe said:

    This is why I'll never get rid of my NX1 & NX500.  I've yet to see a better image right out the camera from anything currently on the market when paired with the S-lenses.  Still amazed by the AF as well.  I bought a A7III but just for super low-light shots.  The NX1 is still my workhorse.

    in terms of video , can nx500 compete with a7iii ?

  6. i don't understand...ya'll want a cine cam...but if that's REALLY what you want there are better options out there...hell, you can find a used red one mx for about the same price...3k 60fps, 4k raw, 120 in 2k...

    gh5s might have more bells & whistles but the red one is a cine cam and the other is a prosumer cam...plus the red won't give you that icky digital video look

     

×
×
  • Create New...