-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Batou Bato got a reaction from kye in Canon XC10 4K camcorder
hi @kyeI had the same impression as @Mattias Burling
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGEYd863ekw)
i don't like "I hate" manual focus By Wire, for me it's the biggest problem with this camera
-
-
Batou Bato got a reaction from Asmundma in Canon C200 vs Panasonic GH5, a preview
google translate
"he who can do more can do less" Unfortunately this is not the case here, as usual …Since the time we understood the lesson…
(Panasonic, sony, canon are a Japanese company that shares the market with well-established strategy, there is no competition between them
And the two new camera of canon and panasonic demonstrates it very well)
From this imposed logic, for me the C200 is the competitor of the RED and not the PANA EVA
When you buy a red it is for the RAW, It should be the same for the c200
Generally the must used compression in REd is the redcod 5.1 in 4k it gives 30 min of video in a card of 128G
It's very very manageable for a fiction This is one of the great big advantage of red, the compressed RAW Redcode
The c200 record in 4K RAW " light " 15 min of video on a 128 card, is double! Of an RED.
The advantage of the c200 on the RED is the price ! (camera body and Recording card media) Autofocus and canon optics , low light performance ,built-in ND Filter, Weight Size, ergonomie.
Unfortunately the c200 does not record in Raw 2K otherwise it could record 30 min of video on a card of 128G " Of course, It's cool to have the optional 4k :p "
I worked on movies participate in festivals such cannes Berlinale venise, all the projection are always in 2K even in cinemas at the distribution .
And many are waiting to go directly to the 8k, and will not invest in 4k DCP projectors
And I can tell you that the most important in an image is the color dynamic range and (Organic noise, if there is)
And the C200 canon She has this, "in theory"
-
Batou Bato got a reaction from IronFilm in A look at the camera setup on Oliver Stone's Vladimir Putin Interviews, with DP Anthony Dod Mantle
it could be a 5D mark III, no ? How you can make the différence between a 5D mark II and a mark III with looking at these pictures only? @Andrew Reid
You knew very well that the close-ups does not pose big broblem of moire and aliasing
For a filming in FHD with a C300 and an XC10 the choice of a 5D mark III as a B camera It seems obvious to me
And I think a "soft" image is more flattering for the face of putin
-
Batou Bato got a reaction from tupp in A look at the camera setup on Oliver Stone's Vladimir Putin Interviews, with DP Anthony Dod Mantle
it could be a 5D mark III, no ? How you can make the différence between a 5D mark II and a mark III with looking at these pictures only? @Andrew Reid
You knew very well that the close-ups does not pose big broblem of moire and aliasing
For a filming in FHD with a C300 and an XC10 the choice of a 5D mark III as a B camera It seems obvious to me
And I think a "soft" image is more flattering for the face of putin
-
Batou Bato got a reaction from Ivanhurba in A look at the camera setup on Oliver Stone's Vladimir Putin Interviews, with DP Anthony Dod Mantle
it could be a 5D mark III, no ? How you can make the différence between a 5D mark II and a mark III with looking at these pictures only? @Andrew Reid
You knew very well that the close-ups does not pose big broblem of moire and aliasing
For a filming in FHD with a C300 and an XC10 the choice of a 5D mark III as a B camera It seems obvious to me
And I think a "soft" image is more flattering for the face of putin