Batou Bato

very good test of 2014 it takes into account many parameters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E92jDQpou4Q&ab_channel=kurtenbachfilm

hi @kyeI had the same impression as @Mattias Burling
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGEYd863ekw) 

i don't like "I hate" manual focus By Wire, for me it's the biggest problem with this camera  

xc10 test 
 

23 minutes ago, tupp said:

Be careful!  Vlad can find you!

I hope he has a sense of humor :D It's more professional than personal 

27 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Erm because the 5D Mark III doesn't have moire. Also I didn't look at those pictures only, I watched the entire series of 4 hour long episodes and it pops up quite a bit.

It is true that the image looks more like the mark II because of the moire 

it could be a 5D mark III, no ? How you can make the différence between a 5D mark II and a mark III  with looking at these pictures only? @Andrew Reid   

You knew very well that the close-ups does not pose big broblem of moire and aliasing

For a filming in FHD with a C300 and an XC10 the choice of a 5D mark III as a B camera It seems obvious to me 

And I think a "soft" image is more flattering for the face of putin

9 hours ago, Batou Bato said:

 

google translate 

"he who can do more can do less"  Unfortunately this is not the case here, as usual …Since the time we understood the lesson…

(Panasonic, sony, canon are a Japanese company that shares the market with well-established strategy, there is no competition between them

And the two new camera of canon and panasonic demonstrates it very well)

From this imposed logic, for me the C200 is the competitor of the RED  and not the PANA EVA 

When you buy a red it is for the RAW, It should be the same for the c200 

Generally the must used compression in REd is the redcod 5.1 in 4k it gives 30 min of video in a card of 128G
It's very very manageable for a fiction This is one of the great big advantage of red, the compressed RAW Redcode
The c200 record in 4K RAW " light " 15 min of video on a 128 card, is double! Of an RED.

The advantage of the c200 on the RED is the price ! (camera body and Recording  card media) Autofocus and canon optics , low light performance ,built-in ND Filter, Weight Size, ergonomie.

Unfortunately the c200 does not record in Raw 2K otherwise it could record 30 min of video on a card of 128G " Of course, It's cool to have the optional 4k :p "

I worked on movies participate in festivals such cannes Berlinale venise, all the projection are always in 2K even in cinemas at the distribution .
And many are waiting to go directly to the 8k, and will not invest in 4k DCP projectors

And I can tell you that the most important in an image is the color dynamic range and (Organic noise, if there is)
And the C200 canon She has this, "in theory"

"written with google translate"

I do not know if I am the only one to wait the test of the xc10 by andrew  : (   especially when it compares the xc10 to a c300 (mark2)

On 03/12/2016 at 11:12 PM, Andrew Reid said:

I am slowly getting round to finishing my mammoth XC10 review.... expect it this week!

i can't wait to see him !

17 hours ago, kidzrevil said:

@hyalinejim really appreciate you for this test ! I am going to now focus on getting the best results using the right combination of in camera tweaks to eos standard & diffusion filtration

hello,  

@hyalinejim @kidzrevil  @BenEricson

"i hope my English is understandable"

I like your pictures : )  

I just bought an xc10 I will start to make tests in my turn, I bought it to make a documentary

in your opinion, if you only have a single tiffen filter to choose to shoot in 1080p only and probably in WIDE DR mod, what would it be ? 

here a test but in french (The test was done before the firmware update) http://urlz.fr/4qxf

basically they say that the c log is not a LOG curve but a compression of the highlights and WIDE DR is better choice 

the other problem with standard settings is that the signal level of the contour is very, present on the XC10

"DSLRs are generally free of this phenomenon, as a result of the digital processing of the purely video signal, which gives a "tv" effect to the images (the most original of the "Detail" correction was to visually correct the response of the cathode ray tube which , Softens transitions by a contrast enhancing treatment on each side of the transition"

I hope canon will make an update otherwise it is not worth its price...