tonysss

i tell the truth.But I encourage to continue try.
I haven't even mentioned   the colors. The way of shooting it's the main problem.
 

To be honest it's not even average.
You have to study a lot and most important see great videos and search the way they did those.
Catching a camera that is capable of decent to great image doesn't mean you are capable too.
Don't give up and keep going.
 
 

This is like one of those back and forward fashion things, where everyone would once be eager to show how big and complex their rig was, now everyone wants to show how simple and barebones their setup is ?.

(https://youtu.be/AVuwmQo3YRc)
 
--
 
 
 

Raw is for amateurs that can't get the shot right in 8 bit.... ?

I still consider it a better picture (OG BMPPC).
 
 For more than a year I have been waiting for a video from BMPCC4k that would excite me
 
 

More BMMCC. The skin tone and color rendering is pretty incredible. 
 
 

Yes ultra compact cinema setting ?

Last work (BMMCC)
 

Yes ultra compact cinema setting ?

Last work (BMMCC)
 

Not to get too off topic but you mentioned the blackmagic micro cinema camera.   Everytime I use it I think I should just throw all my other cameras (z6, xt3, etc) in the trash.  For me too it has the best look to it by far.  But, you really have to work to use that camera with all of it's quirks.  Folks say you can soften modern cameras in post, but I've never seen good examples of that to match something like the bmmcc.
I wish BM or another co. would just package that same sensor into a newer body with all the ergonomics and battery life of a modern cam.

the best documentary shots I do when my camera can't be seen.

the best documentary shots I do when my camera can't be seen.

No offense but if you need *8k* to crop and re-frame for 1080p editing you got bigger issues than resolution! ?

I will never understand, do you shoot or are you just some kind of geek. Because I will never understand people that says thing like that. I mean, can someone at real viewing distance even see more than 2k. The perfect example is the Alexa 2.8k sensor, I don't see anyone complaining about lack of resolution. It is just the geek that might find it sexy to be able to count every pores in an actress face when stopping the image.

I don't want or need 8k.
 

Orig. Pocket with orig.Nikon battery = 50min-60min. If i imagine BMPCC4K with NP970, i'm glad i have a real POCKET!  ? with 2x stabilized lens and mic, and still in the palm of your hand... 

 

Orig. Pocket with orig.Nikon battery = 50min-60min. If i imagine BMPCC4K with NP970, i'm glad i have a real POCKET!  ? with 2x stabilized lens and mic, and still in the palm of your hand... 

 

Orig. Pocket with orig.Nikon battery = 50min-60min. If i imagine BMPCC4K with NP970, i'm glad i have a real POCKET!  ? with 2x stabilized lens and mic, and still in the palm of your hand... 

 

Orig. Pocket with orig.Nikon battery = 50min-60min. If i imagine BMPCC4K with NP970, i'm glad i have a real POCKET!  ? with 2x stabilized lens and mic, and still in the palm of your hand... 

 

here's simple cheap music video, BMMCC - Tokina 11-16 , Sigma 18-35 , Vitrox EF
 

here's simple cheap music video, BMMCC - Tokina 11-16 , Sigma 18-35 , Vitrox EF
 

I would not suggest that most people swap the GH5s for the P4K. I have several P4Ks, the GH5, & the GH5s cameras. I use them daily and I like the GH5s and the P4K both very much. The GH5s & the P4K are totally different animals, each with strengths. If I am doing a run & gun type event, I regularly take the GH5s cameras, as they are easy to use, have great battery life, and can produce great images straight out of camera. If I am filming a music video, interview, or similar, I regularly take the P4Ks. The P4Ks allow you to record RAW and produce lovely footage, but they require lots of attention to get great results. They also have lots of issues like focus issues (slow), handling, poor battery life, gimbal balance issues, post processing, etc. The GH5s is much easier to just grab, shoot, and produce great results straight out of camera.
As long as you are aware of the P4K limitations, and are aware of the post processing requirements, you should love the P4K. It is capable of producing amazing footage.

here's simple cheap music video: (shooting no more than 2 hours, and edit 2h)
BMMCC - Tokina 11-16 , Sigma 18-35 , Vitrox EF.
 

here's simple cheap music video: (shooting no more than 2 hours, and edit 2h)
BMMCC - Tokina 11-16 , Sigma 18-35 , Vitrox EF.
 

Hmm pretty much the same look output wise I think, with a Lot less convenience. Interesting decision.