Vladimir

im in. this is from 1.6x scope, first test with 50f2:

6 hours ago, njekolino said:

Woah, this is pretty cool - whats your handheld setup?

xt2/konica40f1.8/noname speedbooster - its really compact and have a good speed.

still running and gunning with my pocketsize handheld setup (100fps fw update is all i needed )

15 hours ago, MrSMW said:

Viltrox EF-FX2?

i've been using it with canon 28/1.8 here on a shots with dancing girl and couple of other:

and it did pretty well, also totally ok for photo. Although i have a minor glitch before i updated firmware to latest version.

13 minutes ago, IronFilm said:

Why.................

Because a work of a whole crew looks silly in compare with one man bts ( I have no other explanations)) 

50 minutes ago, IronFilm said:

Would hope the music video though is going to be even more epic ?

Not gonna happen) here's compare my bts and a video that already complete:

https://youtu.be/9-m-yoC6i1I - Alexa mini/Ronin, operator, fpuller, mechanic and a director on w/less monitor

And my humble bts, that was presented to client in 360p quality) https://vimeo.com/293635505

Also thx for all your comments guys, i'm really suffering in lack of reaction on my works)

And again it's gonna be better than actual music video)

if not pleased with just 1080/15p ive heard they're workin on a series of internal-external recorders for more advanced shooters

8 hours ago, jbCinC_12 said:

Beautifully shot.  Did you use the Konica as well?

 

nikkor 55/1.2 with/without speedbooster

29 minutes ago, androidlad said:

X-T2/X-H1 120fps is derived from line-skipping the full sensor, moire/aliasing/noise are severe, the video above (and a few similar ones) use heavy grain and aged film effect to cleverly mask those image artifacts. It's a nice workaround but has limited use.

true, aliasing is bad, so im shooting with fast [soft] lenses wide open, 360° and as you said adding a lot of grain (i like it anyway)) over original noise. not suited for clean work but to catch a moment its enough for me. here is another example of 100fps but with xh1; theres a lot of red so watch in 2160 quality (yeah its funny chosing 2160 option to watch 720-like footage but its YT compression bbe )): 

9 minutes ago, Thomas Hill said:

Beautiful. What lens(es) and how high did you go on the ISO?

konica 40/1.8 and cheap noname speedbooster (and a little of machining work). most probably highest iso is 1600 (since i dont do post nr), maybe 3200 in one or two shots.

4 hours ago, Inazuma said:

oh damn, forgot about the 120fps update! Is it any good?

decide yourself ) (shot this handheld with xt2)

what a bs to ask a regular people to judge artistic instrument which bokeh is. people care about content and what an idiotic ( and impotent ) thing to let them decide which tool is better for creator. 

i spend the whole summer with xh1 and updated xt2 just now to check if i can live without ibis again ( xt3 specs is so juicy)

i ended up thinkin about gettin rid of xh1 and just stay with what i already have) heres my test: xt2/konica40f1.8/noname speedbooster 100fps handheld all the way:

still lack of eterna/d400 makin me really sad and i wonder if anyone can tell how much difference between editing 8bit 4K IPB and 10bit 4K ALL-I files

im also wonder how much time should pass to fuji discover that 25/50/100 option on the shutter ring is extremely desirable in 50 Hz country

1 hour ago, wolf33d said:

Secondly for colors it is rumored that at least the next A7S III will have Venice color science which is reputed among the best.

i wonder if anyone had the experience with both fs5 and fs5 markII to prove that. had tested a7iii and didnt find it anywhere close to fuji/nikon colourwise 

16 hours ago, wolf33d said:

18-55 is stabilized. Same as IBIS.

do you think  i've shot all these video and still dont know there's ois on my 18-55? (i have issues with my english not my eyes) 

im not using ois to keep batteries longer. thats the point when u have a deal with 126s and just to lazy to constantly changing it. still dont suffering from shaking

13 hours ago, crevice said:

Was that entire video shot on the xt-2? Your colors looks fantastic - any LUTs or did you just grade that by hand?

thanks, there is some (one or two) like Kodak or Astia film luts, custom contrast and some little lumetri cc action but thats not so important, just adding little flavour over ETERNA. which is the thing that made cc fun again) i've also tried first time 1080/60 flog internally on xt2 but that was a bad idea. ETERNA is a time saver fun comebacker. id love to get that simulation on xt2 ( why not - its fuji )

of course if its some big scenario case then its always good to have alexa-on-ronin setup. but when u had skill u can scale it on any production and needs. and here some more xt2/crane/18mm combination ( now with ibis stabilized x-h1/55mm):

and with 4k60 and better rs there's even easier to get stabilized results. crane/xt3 is stuning combo in terms of possibilities/$

btw does anyone knows if xt3 output 1080/120 in 10bit over hdmi or not?

one-handed gimbals are great and ibis isnt necessary (all from 0:55 is shot with original crane/xt2/18-55kit lens):

and while new x-t3 have all those cool features it still lacks of IBIS, so im happy to carry x-h1 on some cool events)

*please watch in 4K quality only, theres a lot of dark red environment  and yt compression is wild

4 hours ago, jonpais said:

Thanks for clearing that up. Thank the lord it’s not a Sony sensor.

4 hours ago, jonpais said:

That explains why the image quality is so awesome.

thanks for all the comments guys, here some more from the same place (but adult event): 

and here is a complete work (some art event deep inside russian territory):

X-H1 fw ver 1.10, 55mm lens handheld without rig, no stabilization added in post: