independent

This needs to be 16mm

This needs to be 16mm

Rode is a prosumer company. 

Outlawed? Good luck with regulation!
A more likely solution would be a combination of a few things:
Platform verification and monitoring (Twitter does a good job) NFTs to secure authorship Education. Younger generations grow up w/ digital tech and are much more perceptive and discriminating. The gullible boomers are on the wrong side of disruptive technologies, but this too shall pass Anyways, there's also a creative and productive element. Why can't a creator choose to express in a different voice? 

I get it. Never getting rid of my 5D iii

I get it. Never getting rid of my 5D iii

I get it. Never getting rid of my 5D iii

Ah the ol’ reach around from down under 

Ah the ol’ reach around from down under 

They need to ditch this ridiculous "pocket" design. I hope they release an updated 4K version of the real pocket camera. Also, a Komodo-like, modular box design w/ built in NDs. 6-8K. I don't expect autofocus or any cutting edge technology, but they can make these relatively simple changes. 

I just had a quick look at this and it seems that when using EF lenses with the MC21 you need to turn on the IS switch on the lens in order for IBIS to work. This was a bit strange to me as I'm used to a Metabones Speedbooster where the lens IS switch has to be turned off for IBIS to work. If it's not an IS lens then you don't worry about the switch, lol, because there isn't one. Then there are two options. One is body only and this is the best:

 
The other is a weird mixture of body and lens:

 
This second option is jerky with EF lenses on an MC21 and is in no way comparable to body only. So I don't think there is a way to have both full IBIS in all directions plus whatever the lens can do.
But, I think I remember seeing some  YT reviews with Panasonic lenses where the reviewer just stuck with body only. So I would say that body only is also good enough for EF lenses.

Looks like DJI is releasing a RS3 Mini
 
 

To be fair, I don’t think the main demographic of this camera would require DCI standards. Nobody aiming for cinema release would be using this camera. Much better options. 
This is for influencers. 
 

Tested on our R5 and RED Raptor, the RF 50mm 1.2 far out resolved the EF 50mm, which looked out of focus in comparison. Resolution isn't everything, but the EF also suffered from more chromatic aberration, fringing, and busier bokeh.
I don't know. Great lenses are expensive—even EF lenses like the 35mm 1.4 ii or the most recent EF zooms. The RF are nearly the same price as those—and the Sony counterparts as well. If you're complaining about the RF, you might as well complain about everything else.
About the RF exclusivity, we'll see how it plays out. Still see a ton of 3rd party RF lenses being released on B&H. 
 

Sensor size will increase, but it will be subject to limiting factors. One, diminishing returns and less demand for what a larger sensor size can get you. Not everybody in the market will need or care. Second, AI will increasingly simulate what larger sensors offer. 
Doesn't mean Apple and Google will dominate the pro industry. The pros will remain; what won't be the large prosumer market that buys pro gear for no good reason. They won't be able to afford the pro gear nor will they need it.
 

Don’t want kids?

Oh man, the Red One. I learned to operate with it, and while it was sometimes quite a bitch to work with, no question how amazing it was for digital. Truly groundbreaking. Saved up to buy the Scarlet as a wet hire, switched to Blackmagic and Canon for more commercial work, and now I'm back on Red because they priced it right. 
If you're into the Red One, you already know the answer. Komodo. 6K 16-bit redcode raw and global shutter will give you the most detailed, color-rich, film-like moving image. 
While this forum is centered more around hybrid, consumer cameras, discussions lean almost 99% video. Probably because what people want are accessible cinema cameras. Well, we've never gotten a pro cinema camera within reach until the Komodo.
 

Rumors are canon rumors is going to Spotify. (C1)

Rumors are canon rumors is going to Spotify. (C1)

Rumors are canon rumors is going to Spotify. (C1)

All these contemporary cameras are more similar than different. In nearly every case, practical concerns of the endeavor will, or should, determine your choice. 
At some point, we're all just arguing over how many angels are dancing on the head of a pin.
The correct answer of course is just one fallen angel, the Komodo. 
 
 

Canon is making good enough cameras so far. It's a cutthroat business and making shitty cameras isn't going to help.
We're not getting better cameras if say Sony was the only game in the town. Innovation is incentivized through competition, and the improvement in camera tech over the past 10 years has been nothing short of astounding. 

Lastly, not sure why so many are emotional. Pretense of certain obligations? Companies have to abide by consumer protection laws, but none are obligated to fulfill your personal idea of a perfect camera that violates all patents that's infinitely future proof with unlimited upgrades with a lifetime warranty.
A company's aim is to sell you something. If you don't like it, don't buy. 
 
 

Still think Komodo has it. 
Global shutter and Recode Raw > Canon Raw.  That patent, may it burn in hell, is still doing its job.
 

Still think Komodo has it. 
Global shutter and Recode Raw > Canon Raw.  That patent, may it burn in hell, is still doing its job.
 

Neither ND nor IBIS? That’s a misstep. Not sure I buy the omission due to heat; there’s a…fan.