valery akos
-
Posts
52 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by valery akos
-
-
you can't use your lens with any anamorphic, you need longer focal length... especially with the Isco
-
there's one in UK, eBay
-
never existed this ''SOLA'' thing, it is seller's own made experiment lens and in general be aware of this seller: in the recent past he made a 1.33x one and put a stick on it and named it: ''Century Optics USA'' ? ... He fooled someone but when the buyer discovered the scam, he left him a nice negative feedback ?
-
-
-
When you bought it?
-
9 hours ago, webrunner5 said:
50 to 150 dollars seems to be the norm.
which decade you're referring about? never sold for less than $500 the red ones, except of rare findings sometimes of course
-
-
sounds bit overpriced bro, the Recti sells $1200 new & you ask $1500 for the rest? anyway not my biznes
-
-
The 36 without MC is not MC It is simply the same lens like the old original Iscorama. Later they made the 36-MC
read this from Andrew Reid (he has one) in that link below:
" It isn’t the multi-coated MC version. "
source (scroll down to that page): https://www.eoshd.com/2012/04/shooting-in-london-on-the-5d-mark-iii-with-iscorama-36-1-5x-anamorphic/
-
On 24/09/2017 at 2:46 PM, andycorleone said:
Hi, Do I need any sort of adapter to attach a Rectilux Hardcore DNA to a Kowa 8z 16H?
Nope. Use the screws provided with the DNA & you're ready to go.
-
On 28/05/2017 at 8:25 PM, rokkimort said:
Link?
next time it will appear I'll send you. but it's not the one he's talking about from a US seller
-
On 09/05/2017 at 10:27 PM, rokkimort said:
There is no such thing as "ISCO MINI 2X ANAMORPHIC". It sounds similar to the way that certain ebay seller is calling lots of his lens. Probably it's just an ultra-star, overpriced as hell. Double-focus for sure.
is the lens golden? Does it have red gears attached?
exists indeed & appears every couple of years. smaller than the usual Isco "ultra star" ones
-
-
EOSHD C-LOG
In: Cameras
-
having tested the G80 & the A7R2 & A7S2, the in-body stabilizer of Panasonic is better
-
7 hours ago, funkyou86 said:
What does exactly bother you? IMO the flares are slightly better than on the 50 version, the image quality looks the same.
the "50" is sharper, this one is like the Rangefinder
-
this problem occurs only with G80/G85... It's Pana's stabilazer that creates the problem....
-
I don't like this lens, their 50-anamorphot is better, this one seems a real fail though
-
Lens again for sale here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/252642514154
-
I felt across this one: http://www.ebay.com/itm/262705764935
Anyone knows something about it?
-
"within the blinds, the cyclope is the king"
-
mini iscorama?? this thing doesn't exist. I mean the "mini" :D
this is a recently came out adding to these Isco models (so no actually Iscorama, but Isco, a bit different) from a seller in germany searching for fishes to bite :D
Shooting with the Panasonic S1 in Barcelona
In: Cameras
Posted
I haven't read all previous comments, but: IT IS NOT FUJIFILM YET in terms of skin tones colors etc. NO ONE can beat Fuji on these yet...