Jump to content

docmoore

Members
  • Posts

    354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by docmoore

  1. You are right.

    They may have done better with a 0 - 6 stop or 7.5 stop ND ... not sure if that would be possible as I assume that the elements

    cannot be removed from the image path.

    I have ext Vari NDs for 12 lenses ... 7 different sizes ... and non Vari NDs for matte box and 82 mm sizes. Two large filter packets and

    another two pouches for the matte box 4.5 x 6 glass Schneider filters.  Have to say that one adapter with ND sounds like a bit easier

    than all the others. Two of the Schneiders or two of the Firecrest Ultras would pay for the adapter.

    If you have a couple of lenses you may not want this ....

    I keep looking at larger cine cams with internal NDs ... much more convenient.

  2. On 10/9/2019 at 7:05 PM, KC Kelly said:

    Get a Masters in business.  It's applicable to all fields.  It also shows that you're serious about the bottom line, and will help you running your own business.

    Great advice.

    A classmate of mine received his MBA with an emphasis in video and marketing in 1979 ... jumped to a management position producing all of

    MCI/Sprint videos and advertising for over 20 years. He could have easily moved to cinema ... producing and directing had he desired.

    The short answer is sacrifice now for a potential long career ... MBA allows you to go anywhere ... Cine or VFX are quite limiting ... and God willing

    you will have 50 years to figure out that your passions change with age but a higher degree allows you more control of your present and future.

  3. I may not make a lot of points with the following:

    Man up and accept that a Variable ND is not a series of internal ND filters on a Cinema Camera.

    Canon has given you an alternative ... and a clear hole filler at a bargain price ... $500 USD for both ... to purchasing a C200/300 II/500 II

    No vignetting color good to 8 stops works with all the EOS adapted lenses ...

    We are not going to find the perfect camera or system ... but what is available to us today kills all the older stuff.

    Days of 'Mosquito noise' with the EX1R are gone ... Log 4K with a crop Stills Old EOS lens compatibility ....

    Most pathetic are the guys on YT who complain that there is not a Hermes case for the adapter when you are not using it ...

    Get real ... if it does not meet your perceived needs ... buy something else.

    As close to internal NDs as you will find south of $5K

     

  4. 4 hours ago, IronFilm said:

    Ah! I think I've heard of this bug on the MixPre series, were you using your MixPre as a USB audio interface?

     

    No I use the USBPre 2 for the audio interface.

    I have a PIX-LR attached to my PIX-E5 but have used a separate recorder for redundancy and would like to maintain that approach. I considered moving up from the

    P6K and getting something with a bit more robust XLR connection and preamps (FX9) but the picture in my situation would be hard to improve upon so just want a easy

    to manage interface with great sound ... as I run all the camera lights and sound solo.

  5. One week and no report?

    Seriously ... how is the new 833?

    And is it that significant of a step up in audio quality from the Maxx ... or just better routing. I understand it has dual bus Duggan(?) mixing?

    My Mixpre 6 II went back this week .... frustration mainly with TC in Resolve 16.1 ... just unable to sync files that I could manually read as same TC. And even though video

    is 32 bit in Resolve ... audio cannot handle 32 bit float so had to record in 24 bit ... which is fine with me but obviates the draw of the II series. Biggest issue with

    it was when you turned it off ... it reset to base record settings every time so that you had to go into menus to set something other than 44.1Khz.

    So I am considering the Maxx ... 633 ... or up to the 833. Dont need complex routing but do want best audio possible.

  6. 16 minutes ago, thebrothersthre3 said:

    As far as I know its still there on the Pocket 4k but the Pocket 6k doesn't have the issue. That said it can be fixed in post on the Pocket 4k, while on the Panasonic S1 you are just screwed.

     

    I have a feeling he is just used to the excellence from Arri or RED. Would be interesting to see him compare it to the EOS R, Fuji XT3, and Sony A7III

    I thought the panasonic codec with Vlog is H264 10  bit 150mbps?

    I think that you have 4K 10 bit 400 mbps but 5.9k and higher frame rate is limited to H265 420

  7. 1 hour ago, DBounce said:

    Did Blackmagic solve their red clipping issue? 

    I guess I should explain that the blue clip is the least of my concerns ... H2665 10 bit 420 would not be pleasant on my 2009 MacPro 5.1 and it looks

    like the codec is a bit limited with regards to major grading ... I rarely get by with less than 7 nodes in Davinci Resolve ....

    May be a bit more noise than I would prefer and Matt Allard suggests that the camera is a bit challenged in mixed lighting. One wonders why Panasonic did not

    hire someone who could light their scenes a bit better. But Matt shoots RED and Arri for his professional work so his threshold for excellence may differ from many.

  8. I could not find how to link one part of a thread so I copied this ....

     

    kacofilms

    Posts: 4

    Joined: Fri May 31, 2019 12:45 pm

    Real Name: Martin Kacvinsky

    Re: Official "Look what I shot!" Thread

    Fri May 31, 2019 1:03 pm

    Hey guys, 

    as a long time Canon 5D raw (magiclantern) shooter I have decided to switch to Pocket 4K this year.


    Couple of my observations:
    1. It would be amazing if the developers could add a function that will red-cross the display when not recording (or any more visible information). The shutter button is quite soft and having a finger ready to shoot all the moments you cannot recreate (wedding is full of unexpected moments) I have ended up shooting my shoes couple of times (the camera has been shooting and when I hit record to start recording, it actually stopped).
    2. When the SD/Cfast or SSD starts to fill, the camera boot up time slows significantly. No matter if I use interal cards or external SSD. The file system (mac vs exfat) also doesn't seem to make any difference. Any chance to have improvement here? Since the camera is power hungry you have to turn it off a lot.

    And couple of opinions:
    1. Internal mics are really good.
    2. Battery time can be expected (wasn't much better when shooting raw with 5D). Altough boot up time is really bad with cards half full.
    3. I find cdng to be easier to playback/color grade then braw (with a really fast hard drives). When playing back cDNG, there is almost no CPU/GPU activity. However if I playback braw Q5, it can be really choppy (my drive array is fast enough).

    In the end I am really happy with the results. Thank you Blackmagic

     

     

     

  9. Cfast or SSD may be best.

    I have had the camera since release and it has been very solid ... as was the P4K.

    However I shoot mainly to T5 and use an Anton Bauer external battery. I found that the Sony

    NPF batteries would not charge the internal battery whereas the AB does.

    I also tend to shoot at 24P ... 5.9K and have a number of 20 minute shoots that have been perfect.

    The 2Tb T5 gives me 200+ minutes of recording and my fastest SD ... 4 minutes. So it just fills the slot.

    My Angelbird CFast handles the 5.9K without issue.

     

    Dave I would try the external power adapter and see if the issue persists and then look at card options. If the 

    power adapter is good ... may need to try an external ... NPF or dTap to see if that is successful. 

    With these data rates the camera really shines with SSD ... 2Tb Samsung T5 is down to $350 ... 

    It may just be a dodgy camera body ... BM is known for very quick support ... so you may start looking at

    that while you work through the issue.

    Blackmagic did say that boot time is lengthened by the number of files on a card.

    I tend to dump everything daily and make a backup then reformat the card every time

    I start the camera. I realize that is not possible for many who are out without a way to offload files.

    Here is a thread on the BM Forum that discusses slow boot with a T5 ....

    https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=96951

     

     

  10. 2 hours ago, Stab said:

    I mainly shoot weddings, in 4k 50 fps, with the S1 which does a 1.5x crop in that mode. The S1H still has the crop and thus is pretty much the same thing for me. Except for the Dual Native ISO, but let's face it, the S1 is already very very good at ISO 6400 and I never ever needed to higher in my life till now. The photo capabillities are the same I hear.

    So pretty much the only reason why I would like to upgrade is the OLPF, because I do see moiré here and there, especially on men's clothing during weddings. But that's a tough sell to me at the current pricepoint.

    If you do shoot proper films / cinema / anamorphic, then yes, the S1H is a major upgrade over the S1. But for 'event filmmaking' in 4k, it's not that different.

    Even the V-log in 24 fps 10-bit 422 is exactly the same right? Until raw is coming along.

    No time limit and the ability to write a backup to the dual SD cards seems to be an advantage that might save you at least some embarrassment 

    if you have a fail at a wedding. I hear that retakes are not that common for those events.

    1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said:

    ... they have a high-speed USB C connector is beyond me....

     

     

    And it is so easy on the P6K ... both for recording and then uploading to my computer.

    2 hours of 5.7K 24p to a 2Tb T5 SSD ... which costs $370 these days ... 

  11. If you listened closely to the Panasonic presentation ... Atomos was lauded and the upgrade ... Raw mentioned specifically ... was 

    discussed as a coming announcement ... no date given. Refer to the stream 8:32 - 9:07 ... definitely stated that Panasonic was working closely with Atomos for HDMI

    related Raw output.

    Atomos ProRes Raw will help as the 6K / 5.9K 10 bit is 420

     

×
×
  • Create New...