ekt8750

​I like your policy!
Some may not agree, but from a few (sometimes many) of the comments I have read on this blog, sadly you are spot on.
Wonder if there is some sort of litmus test that could weed them out...  (IQ has to be greater than shoe size for example)

​Yes I think it's an excellent policy!
There are enough idiots who read the blog already, don't want to attract any more idiots!
Enough idiots!
My policy is no idiots!
If you don't agree, you're an idiot!

I can assure you it is not.
They have indeed enabled raw video. At what frame rate and at what maximum resolution for continuous recording has yet to be determined.
What sort of headline would have satisfied you sir?
"Nikon Hacker Enables Raw Video And Further Development Needed To Determine Final Usable Form It Takes Along With Resolution And Frame Rate And File Sizes And Whether It Will Arrive On the Nikon D750 Or The Soon To Be Rumoured D900 Please Wait To Find Out More"
Is that specific enough for you?
Headline writing lesson for Araucaria.
A headline such as that above isn't a headline. It's a sentence.
The purpose of a headline is to grab attention with as few words as possible.
For example:
Forum User Is Negative Wanker
That's a brillaint headline.

And with Premiere you're pulling a lot of hair out trying to learn anything lol

Being able to change the aperture in live view would be nice but not a deal breaker.  ​I don't mind the extra crop in 1080p60. Any added reach in video is fine by me most of the time (especially when I'm shooting skylines from a distance). 
​Sounds good but I still dunno if I should better spend that extra $200-400 on glass.

It's a good camera Matt. It's not as fussy as some of you like to get into. And it's not the best tool for critical work... but knowing that if I wanted to, I could rent a Shogun and get pretty much all I'd want with regard to record length, and range, out of a $900... is cool. I don't expect you to relate to that. I "get" what you and many othera here get off on... really, when it gets down to it... I'm going to just shut myself off right here about that. 
But, for those who're purely interested in the potential of doing great things with very little... even low-end consumer grade... then the information is exciting. Some of us aren't into tinkering with subtleties that other's are so obsessed with. 
So yeah, knowing that if I needed 4:2:2 and didn't have to bother with a bunch of lens changes, and had planned to not need anything beyond ISO800... and all I had to do was rent or borrow a Shogun for the day, etc. then yeah... that's something I might want to do and am thrilled to now know it's an option.
We've chatted a bit privately in the past, but you really don't know me. If you did, you'd know that I'd ultimately be much more proud of myself if I made a cinematic, artistic expression with the lowest end gear, for the lowest cost, inside the reach of anyone for the most part... rather then citing off a bunch of tech gear and grading tricks/expertise, etc. BS about how I bent this sensor and lens combination, effect, with this incredible lighting technique to bid my artistic will, etc. Nothing wrong with that, but If I could find a way to it with the least amount of gear, I'd say that's more impressive that having the state-of-the-art at your fingertips. 
Yeah, you could do it with an iPhone, but in many instances the image quality might be distracting. I'm looking for a way to get the viewer involved, without using tech as a crutch.
Does that answer your question?