jonpais
-
Posts
6,355 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by jonpais
-
-
Fake news.
Quotenot a single mention of the rolling shutter in 4K.
Kai doesn't go hysterical over it because he probably wasn't expecting any better than Canon's 5D Mark IV, but he clearly expresses his disappointment.
Not only does he mention the rolling shutter, he shows us an example of it.
Will this come as a shocker to Canon shooters switching over from their DSLRs? I highly doubt it.
The rolling shutter on the Nikon Z7 is worse than Sony's a7R III, but I don't see anybody shouting to the heavens about that camera either.
You don't even mention rolling shutter in your preliminary look at the Z7.
-
10 minutes ago, Mokara said:
Problem is, you have no way of knowing who YouTube has agreements with.
If you go to the audio library in the creator studio, you can see the current license policies of copyright holders.
-
8 minutes ago, hmcindie said:
Oh yeah, I guess I don't really search for that stuff anymore. It was a horrible camera that everyone loved.
Not sure whether that’s so or what that’s got to do with this discussion, though I do know many people still shoot with those cameras.
Not being argumentative, just wondering what that’s got to do with this thread...
Are you saying rolling shutter’s not such a big deal after all? Or that regardless of how poor a camera is, it will sell like hotcakes? ?
-
3 minutes ago, hmcindie said:
If the rolling shutter in 4k is the same as a 5d mk IV, I'd say it's pretty much the same RS as on a sony 6300/6500. Or about-ish.
How many of those youtubers reported a horrible RS on the a6300? I think it was discussed maybe at the this forum and then not much. It's just... a majority of users seem to still use these 4k cams in 1080p. I sold my a6300 and the guy who bought it uses always the 1080p50 mode because he wants the option to slowdown some shots. The thing is, in 1080p50 the camera looks horrendous.
There are thousands of rolling shutter tests of the a6300 on YouTube.
-
This is nothing new: Engadget, CameraLabs, Videomaker and DPReview all reported about the horrible rolling shutter issue over one month ago.
I seriously doubt Canon outsells Panasonic just because a handpicked number of vloggers don't happen to mention rolling shutter in their hands-on and first impression reviews of the EOS R.
First-look and first-impressions videos are just that and nothing more - not in-depth reviews - which is why Chris and Jordan refer viewers to DPReview's more detailed review on their website.
This review kind of buries the lack of IBIS at the very bottom, likening it to the GH5s - a straight-up video camera if there ever was one - rather than comparing it to their direct rivals, Sony and Nikon - so can't exactly be considered unbiased.
I do happen to have my own biases - I consider a 1.7X crop of much graver consequence than the lack of IBIS - and not a single reviewer mentioned in your article fails to mention it.
Curiously, most also provide ample video samples, charts and tests along with their findings.
-
@Andrew Reid Could you check the focus shift on that Nikon 35mm f/1.8? I understand it's supposed to be quite dramatic. Of course, if you're too busy, I'll do it myself...
-
-
Panny codec easy on computer? ?
-
7 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:
DId I just dream it or does the X-H1 have a setting for linear manual focus?
Cant find it in my camera but since I dont have any native glass it might not be showing.You weren’t dreaming. The Setup Menus (BUTTON/DIAL SETTING)
I’m still trying to figure out what ‘fuocs’ does. ?
-
-
9 minutes ago, BasiliskFilm said:
Stabilisation is not just down to how the sensor moves, it is also about the quality of motion detection and how rapidly the data is processed and fed back to the sensor. Maybe Nikon is onto the next generation on that side of the equation?
Admit it - you just wanted to post that picture again for the fourth time. ?
-
31 minutes ago, joshhr said:
so is there an ETA on this camera at all? 6-12 months or is it simply a waiting game, because all i've heard is 'soon'
none.
-
It's operator error. The camera can't do all the thinking for him.
-
22 minutes ago, Dan Wake said:
thx a lot.
Dear Blackmagic,
I need to work with camera, if I want a videogame I buy a video game. This is software bordering, they draw this line to force people to think they have a film inside the camera, to be be thrifty. this is a gameplay routine, I will not buy your camera until you grow up. it's an imposition there is something fascist in this stupid mentality.
#turngamemodeoff
#weareworkersnotchilds
I actually believe there’s a good reason for this. I think it works the same way on professional cinema cameras like Arri and Red too.
-
2 minutes ago, Dan Wake said:
is it possibl to cancel clips on this camera? thx
No
-
3 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:
My guess is the fringing is lens dependent. Dome of my non L Canon glass fringe like crazy.
It can definitely be a PITA sometimes.Thanks, Mattias, that was my guess as well.
-
6 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:
At ISO 1600, again surprising.
Canon LOG on the EOS R is virtually noiseless, very smooth indeed, with abundant colour info.
The X-H1 shot, same ISO, F-LOG, has more noise in the blacks and a harsher look overall. Why does Canon LOG keep so much colour info and the warmness of the light, whereas F-LOG washes it out?
EOS R:
Fuji X-H1:
Not trolling, Andrew, but the Canon noise reduction appears to be smoothing out fine texture and detail and there's an unusual color fringing going on (green in the windowsill, red in the dresser) unless those are the actual colors - that is absent in the more detailed Fuji shot.
May I ask what the WB was in this comparison?
Are those graded samples? Because they both look rather underexposed for log.
Noise can always be reduced in post, detail cannot be added.
-
Actually, not only is Blackmagic giving away DaVinci Resolve for free, but they’re also throwing in the Video Assist - so the Pocket is really only $500. ?
-
An excellent discussion about all the new lens mounts (without all the fanboy hysteria).
Do the new mounts mean that Nikon and Canon’s older mounts are by definition inferior?
Will Sony have to go back to the drawing board and design a new mount from scratch?
Has anyone in this forum ever felt that their current FF camera lens mount was holding back their creativity?
Lastly, will anyone be able to afford the new 3-pound f/0.95 lenses made possible by the newer mounts?
-
I thought it was Canon this week.
-
38 minutes ago, Danyyyel said:
Went on SAR and zero of those rumors on its site. Those rumors are so wild that I call BS.
Same here.
-
What does any of that have to do with the EOS R? and if you've got a problem with a joke I made, why not bring it up with @Andrew Reid? No point in cluttering up the thread with personal attacks.
3 minutes ago, Snowbro said:Ill go find your post jon, hold on a second.
-
1 minute ago, Snowbro said:
I already knew you had poor reading comprehension, but I should have known. That one is on me. You seem like you would be much happier staying in your sony/fuji forums. The only thing you do here is cry and provide false information. Oh yeah, and solicit photos of minors in vietnam while saying "hehehe".
That's really unacceptable.
-
Nobody is going to kill anybody.
4 minutes ago, Snowbro said:The a7siii is supposedly going to have their newest color science. It will kill everything on the market if it has internal 10 bit and 4k 60
Top 6 videos on EOS R with combined 2 million views and not a single mention of the rolling shutter in 4K
In: Cameras
Posted
The point was not lost on Kai's viewers, either. One writes in the comments section:
and another says:
TBH, not sure what he means by overheating.
and another:
and another: