PANDETTA

Yes.
 
It's his ideas and his writing.  His opinion.  He's not entitled to do anything beyond that.  If he has a favorable initial impression over one piece of gear to another, that's fine.  He was enthusiastic for the C100 awhile back, but that isn't a viable camera for a lot of people.  Big deal.  
 
He's not doing a "Consumer Reports" market study, he's writing His Thoughts about a camera.
 
Welcome to the internet, BTW, hope you like it here.

Can someone give me some info on the current state of RAW in the 7D? I need a B-cam for my BMCC and while the obvious choice seems like the BMPCC I'd be really happy if the 7D was also an option.. But what's it like for practical use (specifically compared to the BMPCC)?
 
Does it have continuous recording? Is it reliable? What are the main cons? 

Non of them.  I have a Nikon D600.  No complaints as a still camera.  The video is no different, far as I can tell, from video from their D7000, or even D3100.  I would be concerned about matching footage from a high dynamic range camera (the BMCC) and contrasty video which is a Nikon after-thought from their camera. 
 
Here is an idea of what you'll be up against, in matching footage.
 
https://vimeo.com/73096779

Some people always only see the surface of the thing. I have a fellow student who just bought a BMCC 2.5k. I'm sure he has been reading how amazing RAW and 2.5K is. However, I don't think he has considered the amount of accessories he needs to operate the camera comfortably, I would say. External batteries, SSD drives, SDI monitor, camera rig,etc. And we haven't covered the post production yet. We all know the ungraded BMCC raw footage is dull and flat. You need to grade the picture to maximize the image quality. The work behind it is just.... On the other hand though, I've tried the ML raw on my 60D in 720p. I found the footages are quite nice and even better then 1080p in H.264. The color is natural and vibrant compared to H.264. I don't feel like I have to do extensive color correction and grading to make it look good. I also noticed the noise of the RAW is much more pleasing and very film grain like while the H.264 is just blocky purple digital sickness.... I always wet myself when I see some lovely film grain....and with anamorphic, it is just pure porn...

Haha how much footage and how many cameras do people intend to shoot with on an average shoot?
 
10 and a data wrangler!? 240 hours worth a day?!
 
Raw is not that hard for a one or two cam shoot if you're reasonably economical on takes like a good filmmaker is.

My eyes have been glued to EOSHD and the Magic Lantern forums all day. So damn excited. Looking forward to seeing Andrew's findings.

Depends on your needs, but I don't care about yours, only mine - and for me, that rules it all is the image.