Jump to content

Nikkor

Members
  • Posts

    2,443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nikkor

  1. The tragic part is that the lens doesn't look as good when you compare it to medium format, and for 4300$ you can buy medium format.

    This is a mamiya 80 1.9 (200$ lens) on a 1500$ Phase one Df with a P45+ back (48x36mm sensor). The bokeh isn't swirley in the corners, equivalent 50mm 1.3,and this lens covers 6x7 (andrewwww put this on your gfx with a speedbooster)

     

    CF072160.jpg

  2. 20 hours ago, Zach Goodwin2 said:

    I am guessing by you all's sarcasm that what you are saying is that low light is not that important, so the key factor in getting a new camera must not be low-light.

    The new key factor is how it looks inside the Closet. Lowlight perfromance in Dressing Room mirror shots are also very important.

  3. 16 hours ago, LindseyL said:

    Hi. Any help would be so appreciated. 

    I shoot primarily video. My primary camera is the SONY FS5 ii. My secondary camera is the Canon 5 D Mark iii. I have had three shoots now where my footage is soft on the Canon using the 24-70 L II 2.8 USM. I have tried every conceivable thing but it does not get any better. Focal length each time is 24 mm. Has anyone else experienced this? I seem to have no issues with this lens on my Sony at various focal lengths. DSLR rookie move - my first and second shoot on this project... I accidentally had the flat picture profile selected. I changed that this time back to standard but still the same issue of the whole shot being soft....

     Thanks in advance. Lindsey

     

    5d wideangle shots are going to look soft, always. If the stills are soft too then you might have a problem.

  4. 2 hours ago, androidlad said:

    It's interesting that people simply assume high resolution sensors have less dynamic range and worse rolling shutter.

    I'll post more info when I'm allowed to, but for now I can say when normalised to 4K, this 100MP sensor performs better than A7 III in terms of dynamic range, sensitivity (QE) and readout speed.

    With The Same Technology applied to large and to small Sensors, guess which one will have larger full well capacity and less rolling shutter.

    100MP is total overkill for fullframe, when will you See diffraction? F5.6? Will they build in a focus stacking program for landscapes? Moving the ibis back and forth, using phase detection pixels to make a depthmap? I know they are not.

  5. 7 hours ago, kye said:

    The approach of skipping FF and having APS-C and Medium Format is an interesting one.  Just wait a decade when everyone wants Medium Format video and all the FF companies will be behind the 8-ball and Fuji will have been there with lenses for a decade!

    I have no idea how much of this video is due to it being a MF camera and how much is colour science, but it looks just great to my eyes:

     

    That camera has a 54x40mm sensor, the fuji is closer to Fullframe having a 44x33mm Sensor 

  6. 1 hour ago, androidlad said:

    Yes it's called S1R.

    Doesn't look the same to me, one being a gigantic interchangable lens camera and the other a pocketable fixed lens camera.

  7. The notion of talent and relating it to final result resonates with your narcissism but has nothing to do with reality. 

    Why do you consider yourself as relevant to film making? Do you have something to offer? Having a camera is not relevant today because everybody has a camera, and if you want to become a director because of your need for admiration and recognition you will fail, not only as a director but as a person because you have a mental illness that needs to be adressed.

    If right now your only skill relevant to film making is making coffe you might try to make coffe for people who make films. If you consider yourself as more relevant you could try and show us why you consider this, I'm not seeing anything.

  8. 4 minutes ago, leslie said:

    the boss bought the cnc for a high rise job that we had started, it was called q1 for awhile it was the tallest residential high rise in australia it literally ran 20-24 hours a day for nearly two years i think. i would load it up in the afternoon, even at night some times start it up and go home. come back the next morning and unload it. it even had a modem built in and was meant to ring a number when it was finished but that aspect never worked. it was pretty damn impressive, a few time it was my fault or another operators fault and occasionally it had its own   issues....  i did feel bad when i screwed up, but i  am confident that i made him more money than i cost him, i still work there part time whenever their busy i go down and do a couple of days work. they recently added a water jet, so i am keen to go and learn that as i have a couple of ideas for my anamorphic lens project that i want to try out :)

    What Parts of the Highrise were done with that CNC machine? Steel node conmections?

×
×
  • Create New...