Nikkor

Honk Honk motherfuckers

Narcisists. Stau away, no cure, only Bad things.

This plus https://www.metabones.com/article/of/HasselbladVtoFujiGmountSpeedBooster 70mm look. Anyone wants to buy a kidney?

What about Self Hosting at Home with a good Connection? I'm speaking out of ignorance.

21 hours ago, Papiskokuji said:

What a pendantic remark ! I know maybe more than a hundred pro photographers, only maybe five, ten at most, use a Hasselblad medium format camera. It's in fashion (and really part of it is mostly for show off reasons, they "NEED" the most expansive gear) and packshots. All the other ones have Canon and Nikon cameras. And a very small part (artist photographer amongst them) use Sony bodys. I bet you couldn't tell them apart in a blind test... If you feel limited by the current Canon, Nikon, etc. bodies in your photography, then you might look elsewhere for improving your art

I actually have a Phase One, have you tried one? Canikons are user friendly, and ok quality wise but they don't compare to a digital medium format camera.

21 minutes ago, nickname said:

Try a real film camera, that will make you question any digital pro or consumer. 

Seriously, I recently used my hasselblad with Kodak portra and had real color prints made about a4 and the results were so beautiful it made me laugh with joy like I have never with any digital photo or print.

It makes me really sad what a downgrade in color reproduction and contrast handeling all the digital toys brought. And here we fight about wich canikony is better. They all still pale next to the real thing.

Totally true, but film is prohibitive.

42 minutes ago, DBounce said:

The sad thing is you can get shots like that all day long straight out of camera without even trying with any prosumer/pro Canon body. Canon, Fuji, Nikon all pretty dam easy to get great results. I haven't tried the full frame Panasonic's yet. I'll take a second look at those when the S1H comes out.

Try a real pro camera like a phase one or a hasselblad, it will make you Laugh when you come back to a crappy canikonfushitsony

Wow, perfect.

3 hours ago, thephoenix said:

raw recording ? maybe soon

https://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-manager-says-fujifilm-gfx-100-enjoys-strong-pre-orders-and-video-raw-recording-may-come-via-firmware-update/

Oh god, I will have to sell a kidney.

14 minutes ago, thephoenix said:

hasselblad doesn't do video.

The h6d-100c does 4K fullframe raw video. With horrible rollingshutter, but it looks cool.

I don't see any mention of 4K, lol? 

Lol

I think it will be a simple Upgrade to the Original x1d, The only Problem I see is the Lack of Capture One Support

1 hour ago, thephoenix said:

no ibis. sorry but i really don't get why a camera company puts ibis in a photo camera and take it off the video oriented camera. makes no sense to me.

I think it is because a sensor with Ibis doesn't sit tight Even with Ibis turned off, so when you are using a rig, the sensor moves around a bit, which is ok for stills but not for video pros.

that camera will be more expensive for shure, but if it has raw, slowmo, and low Rolling shutter ir would be ideal for me.

Wow... that Sounds like some serious quality.

2 hours ago, DBounce said:

Most won't, and if that's you, no worries. Many shoot with vintage glass and are quite happy even though most of that glass struggles to resolve even 8MP images. Let me demonstrate the problem: from the images in the sample gallery, take a look at the image of the rock climber. Adjust the image to 1:1, and look at the rock climber. I think that we can both agree the image is definitely soft. The issue really comes about when the photographer intends to crop in on an image. If this is not a concern of yours... great. You will no doubt save tons of money by using less accurate glass.

That image is soft because it's shot at iso 400 and the shadows got boosted afterwards, MR EAGLE EYES lol The nighttime landscape even has camera shake blur.

You can judge the lensharpness from the glitter photo and it's good.

5 minutes ago, DBounce said:

The newest Fuji lenses can resolve an 8k image... around 32MP... that falls waaaayyyy short of the 100MP that this new camera sensor resolves.  A still at 1:1 looks bad. It should look clear at 1:1. 

Ehm, I don't see the problem in that glitter women picture, I think it's perfectly sharp, look at the nose, those hairs. That's typical bayer pattern detail.

Maybe you are not used to DOF in medium format, portrait shots are more like macro shots DOF wise.

1 minute ago, DBounce said:

I’m not the official that consider it LF... it’s  Fuji that said that.

Yes I understood you. I can imagine that the logic behind saying that is that the detail is on LF levels, but then my nikon d800 is a medium format camera, neither is true.

Anyway, with a proper speedbooster and mamiya rz67 glass (which I personally love because of the smooth look it gives) would be my final destination camera wise, except the part where it only records 11bit and has no raw codec.

1 hour ago, DBounce said:

So apparently it’s officially considered large format, not medium format. But that said the image is quite lovely. 

LF is 4x5" and above.

3 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

Nice camera. For sure. If I had a professional need for it I would love it. But it would never be able to keep up with the work I do.

For hobby use.. staring at my Kipon medium format speedbooster that lets me shoot 400mbit Log with a lesser crop factor than the Fuji... and then over to the $10k which I don't have to spend on camera gear... Pass

But maybe a rental for fun or a specific project in the future.

 

You can put a a speedbooster on this thing too. Imax.

2 hours ago, androidlad said:

Note that 4K on GFX100 has no supersampling, it's derived from weighted binning + some line-skipping from the full width of the sensor, using a 11bit lower precision ADC. In terms of pure image quality, it won't be as good as X-T3 4K, but you get the "MF" look.

Hmm, I'll wait for the next sensor. 

I hope they Release a z6 mkii soon so I can pick up a z6 for cheap.

36 minutes ago, DBounce said:

Most likely... plus lenses.

I have a lot of medium format lenses (if you don't need AF or extreme wideangle, it's a cheap alternative), but 10k is too much for me right now... Let's see the rolling shutter.

It's going to cost atleast 10k, right?

Sony's autofocus is pretty impressive.