Inazuma

Wow.

I watched a Jared Polin video today and he said there's no 24p in 1080p?

Can you shoot with DR400 mode in 1080p and 4k?

Reason 9: You're paid by Canon

/s

Nah this camera does look pretty tasty to be honest

2 hours ago, liork said:

You already have "better low light" in GH5s.

But only on a 10mp image

GH line is dead in the water if they don't introduce more marketable features, such as good AF, better low light. 

18 hours ago, DBounce said:

Practical...? It’s the most practical camera I have owned. Weighs  nothing... High res sensor... flippy screen... uses SD cards... Sets up in a breeze. Turn it on  and it does it’s thing all day long. No worries at all.

As for rolling shutter... unless you constantly shoot with wip pans it’s a non issue. 

Here is an example of something I frequently use the EOS R for... it sits on my motion controller, acting as the B-cam to my C200. You’ll notice in the image that while we own the follow-focus, we never bother to use manual lenses; preferring to instead use the focus module to control the zoom ring... which works amazingly. We can only afford to do this as the AF on the EOS R is rock solid. So much so, that it makes zero sense to use the focus module to control focus. I call that immensely practical. For reference, there is not another camera outside of the Canon family that we would feel comfortable enough to use in this manner.

 

Uses SD cards? HOLY SHIT take my money ?

Look, you do you. That's fine  For me it's a no

21 hours ago, mercer said:

How many stops is it capable of?

About on par with a 16mp m43 camera 

https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_1=panasonic_dmcg85&attr144_2=canon_eos80d&attr144_3=nikon_d750&attr146_0=100_4&attr146_1=200_4&attr146_2=100_4&attr146_3=100_4&attr177_1=off&normalization=compare&widget=542&x=-0.34231387549198966&y=0.20912767186597336

The dynamic range on that sensor blows

As good as the image is on the EOS R, I just don't see how it's a practical camera with that big crop and slow readout, unless you're on a planned shoot where you purposely take the required lenses. I won't take this product line seriously until they remove the crop and also improve the battery life.

On 9/25/2018 at 3:26 PM, wolf33d said:

Panasonic and Sigma ones will be normal priced. Just the Leica will be expensive. 

What did I say huh ? They've announced the lenses now. $2299 for a 50mm f1.4

7 hours ago, Adam Kuźniar said:

Ehh.

For me the issue with Canon cameras isn't what they are, it's what they could've been. 

Ehh well said 

One of the reasons I'm still really interested in shooting Nikon asp-c is because of their lens lineup. They have a lot of smallish, F1.8 primes between 16 and 50mm. They also have that 16-80mm f2.8-4 (which at 50mm is f3.5) and unlike Fuji, have the Tolima 11-16mm f2.8 at a very reasonable price. 

Other than lenses, I loved the ergonomics and image quality of the d5500.

If they're going to do a real upgrade this year then I hope they add good phase detect autofocus in live view, a better rear LCD (oled?), Better preamps (d5500 had garbage) and slightly better OVF (without sacrificing body size). I can take or leave 4k personally. 

14 hours ago, BTM_Pix said:

I think the D5700 might be a winner as well if they keep the price to the sub £600 mark of the current one as I can't be alone in thinking the pricing of new bodies is getting a bit steep now?

Don't forget high end cameras like the D4 used to cost over £3000. And they barely even had any video features (if at all?)

Can the sharpening in video be turned off or reduced?

hey guys, here is a behind-the-scenes type music video I made earlier last year for my friend's band. I decided to shoot it with a mix of a Hi8 cassette camcorder and the Sony A7III with a mixture of profile settings 

Lenses

Sony 50mm f1.8, Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8

I hoped to do more with this band but they're quite on-off with different band members coming and going

Can someone give me the short of why they decided to go with 48mp? 

I want to see you steal something 

Merry Christmas. May you all receive NX1's this year. 

Ok

Mostly you'll be wanting to loads of hard drive space so you can make prores/dnxhd proxies of your footage which are much faster to use during the editing process. I have an Intel I7 and Nvidia 1070 8gb and its still a bit choppy with h264 4k footage. 

Put the camera on a large gorillapod and use it as a chest/shoulder mount

Why does Canon hate EOSHD??

Seems like a camera for quite a niche market (wildlife?). Hope it works out for them

13 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:

Testing color science for jpeg makes little sense imo. Raw is what matters.

Your raw processor can make a huge difference to colour though. For example, Panasonic and Sony RAWS look far better in DXO PhotoLab than in Lightroom