Jump to content

Wild Ranger

Members
  • Posts

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wild Ranger

  1. 17 hours ago, Sage said:

    Poor guy, you're still at V1?!

    I just sent you an email. Great work btw. Blanco o Negro!

    Thanks for sending it!

    And thanks for taking a look to Blanco o Negro, that's my baby, It took me 3 years to make it.

  2. Hi is this update out?

    Sage, can you send it to me to another email? I have the paypal registered to diegohumbertocarles@gmail.com, but i'm not using this anymore.

    Can you send it to me at: matiasjars@hotmail.com 

  3. On 7/12/2017 at 10:45 PM, Sage said:

    People have been asking to have an example of the Alexa conversion on HLG footage, and want to know if it is as good as VLog

    It is a precision match; I finally got around to shooting a comparison, and here are the stills.

    HLG, HLG with GHa Tungsten Main (no further alteration), VLog, and VLog with GHa Tungsten Main (no further alteration)

    Also, something interesting and useful coming soon.

    5a29ebfd15249_HLGTungsten.thumb.png.8b0cd32caf1e9f1239035d25d2e341a2.png5a29ec1bcb3c4_HLGTungstenwithGHa.thumb.png.10367f82ef48333bd1e4fa000f9f365a.png5a29ec6b4659e_VLogTungsten.thumb.png.f93e7eae0d7f1de1b9e1e4108611e76e.png5a29ec856c082_VLogTungstenwithGHa.thumb.png.824ce0170e34d9690c6335d355ff07dc.png

     

    So this mean that i can have the same result using HLG instead of Vlog? (I don't own vlog) 

  4. Hi everyone.

    I'm having a problem with my gh5, i started to notice a strange vertical line in the picture, is not noise pattern( i think) because it doesn't move, actually is like if the image has two slightly different exposures in the frame. This happens only(or at least is noticeable) in low lit situations. Also is visible when a strong light source hits one side of the frame, for example: a small lamp in a low light room, or the light of a windows in a normally lit place. here a show a more pronounced  example (look at the right side) Can you see the perfectly vertical separation? (sorry for the image quality).

    P1004174.thumb.jpg.66c92481029b156eb10b30084decba09.jpg

    I updated the firmware to 2.1 and it doesn't help. I'm thinking that could be more software related because, if this is a problem with the sensor, when i activate the IBIS then it should move, but it doesn't. Also tried different recording modes and resolutions, all pictures styles (except Vlog, i don't have it). Also in raw photos.

    If any can have an idea...

    Also i invite to anyone to try an recreate the problem and post it here to see if this is a bug or issues Panasonic didn't notice or address.

    Cheers!

  5. 8 hours ago, mercer said:

    I just had a look at your Vimeo page and you have a very impressive portfolio. You're a wizard with that D5300 and D7100... Really nice work.I know the Nikon's are supposed to have clean shadows, but I didn't realize how clean until I saw your narrative pieces. How were you exposing? And judging your exposure?

    Hi, thanks. I just expose by eye, just looking the screen. :)

  6. 15 hours ago, Chris Oh said:

    congrats to finishing your project!

    Thanks a lot!!! :)

     

    14 hours ago, mercer said:

    I watched the trailer. And I am blown away... It looks great. Honestly I don't think 4K would have helped the look of this film at all.

    Congratulations on a great looking trailer. I look forward to watching the film!!!

    Damn, I wish the D5500 would drop just a little bit in price. If you are considering a 4K upgrade for your next film... I suggest you stay within the Nikon ecosystem... Maybe a D500. 

    Btw, I would love to hear some production notes... More about camera choice positives and negatives, lenses used, lighting, sound equipment... Anything really. 

    Thanks and good luck with the film. 

    Thanks! I still dont know wich camera will buy next, I dont mind changin brands. Lenses where old Nikons, because they are cheap. Light was very minimal in some situations, nothing very fancy in terms of equipment, a lot of simple light bulbs in some interior scenes. Sound was very changing, but most of the time it was a Rode NTG-2/3 and a Zoom h4n. then it A LOT of post-production time invested to make it sound like a "movie".

     

    13 hours ago, Dustin said:

    As a fellow d5300 owner this is very encouraging! I'm sure it varied but what lighting gear did you typically wind up employing? Also did you use flaat11 or a similar flat picture profile?

    I used a simple Neutral profile little tweaked to make it more flat.

     

    10 hours ago, hyalinejim said:

    Looks incredible. Is the shot with the two wedding rings on the girl's hand S16? And the one after it also looks like film - close up on the girl's eye. If it's S16 then it has amazingly narrow DOF and if it's DSLR then it looks amazingly filmic!

    You must by feeling very proud right now :)

    Most of the shots in the trailer are from the Nikon, including the girls hand and eye.

    Thanks i'm really proud :D 

  7. HI everybody! Long time ago I shared my first Teaser and also some Super 16mm shots from my Feature, "Black or White". After all this time we finally made it so i wanted to share the official trailer. The film is beginning it's festival tour this November so we are hoping to make it travel around the world, finger crossed ;) 

    Activate ENGLISH subs!!! 

    And here on Vimeo for those who don't like Youtube:

    If you are wondering, yes.. We shot all the film on Nikons D7100 and D5300. A little old by now (we started 3 years ago) with all the 4k cameras around, but i think the look holds pretty well. There is also some Super 16mm footage.

     

  8. Maybe it is the noise, but the besides the look, film seems to have something that makes subjects come alive.  As you have said in the youtube comments, Gunpowder jumping is the obvious example. But also in the shot of yourself at the end.  The film shot would look great cut into a home movie reel or music video compared to the sony where you just look bored.

    It has to do with the contrast ratios and color that film manage, its hard to replicate in grading, its doable but hard. I shot with Fuji Eterna recently and looks gorgeous. Also in this test i don't think cameras where graded to mach, that makes more difference.

  9. Ok, I'll come out and say it... the opening titles made me nauseous. Handheld shots are all well and good, but combining them with stationary titles is a recipe for vomit. 

    Ok, nice to know it! I will take that note for the next time.

    I have a question: does the D7100 image differ in anyway from the D5300? 

    I am wondering whether the D7100 has the D5200 image (which had shadow banding) or the clean D5300/D5500. 

    Both cameras have the same kind of image. D7100 have banding but it wasn't hard to clean in post. D5300 is perfect.

  10. Stellar work! This was the creepiest film that I have seen in a while, and I think that it would be for anyone with an imagination. Acting was great and sound design was superb. You should be very proud of this!

    How did you accomplish the slow push into the tape recorder? Motorized slider?

    Hi, Thank you a lot! I am really proud of it.

    The final shot was made with a combination of Stills, 3d mapping and in last place a macro shot of the recorder, then al composed in a after effects, that was the only way, its kind of a imposible shot without a lot of expensive gear.

  11. Film offers a lot of advantages. For example the motion looks a lot better than on digital cameras, just download the original clip and see how "shitty handheld" can look not disturbing but pleasing.

    It's funny those conversations of "film high quality" when most of what film offers are defects. Lovely defects though!!! It looks great, your actors are very good and it brought memories of my own childhood!!!

    Now a new thread is necessary: what do you have in your fridge?? ;-DD

    Yes, film still have a lot of advantages in IQ. This footage is a little deteriorated because the way it was developed, its pushed a little bit. Also the film cans have technically expired for they normal use.

    The most noticeable advantage i notice was dynamic range, if yo try grade it, you will see a huge difference between highlight and shadow, that was the thing that most impressed me. Motion cadence its nice, The "shitty handheld" look was in purpose indeed, the image needed more "spark".

  12. Footage looks very nice- well done. You didn't consider super 8 for the nostalgic "memories from childhood" look? 

    Well, Shooting in film was a decision of the DP, we already could get the SRII camera and equipment, film development and scan for free. All we nedded was to buy the stock. Super 8 never cross my mind, although it could look nice, it was going to be much lower quality.

  13. Hi everyone. I have uploaded a test sequence with shots from a indie feature I´m doing. We Shot a small scene with film because we wanted a really particular look for this par in the movie, more vintage, like memories from childhood. Se we shot on a SRII super 16mm Fuji Eterna 8673 stock. Then scanned on an Arri scanner.

    I never color graded film. So wanted to hear some opinions about.

    If any one have questions, please be my guest ;) 

    PASSWORD: fuji test

    Also, i wanted to share the raw clip for anyone who want to give it a try. Remember its film log. compressed in DnxHd

    https://mega.nz/#!hFh1hAyA!b0mxVAk1KtjL7guXYcRExBEcdTAVinaTLfMIQq5k-24 

  14. ​​Wow, this is wonderful! Really great camera movements. Nice grading, too. How these files hold up during color correction? Do they break as easily as AVCHD?

    ​Thanks. It holds up very good grading, the internal encoder for h.264 its top quality. Although I always use a little noise reduction to fix some of the compression artifacts and chroma noise.

×
×
  • Create New...