maxmizer

6 ore fa, Tone1k ha detto:

allora sicuramente le grandi compagnie di produzione avrebbero avuto il vento e risparmiato un po 'di soldi ingaggiando ottimi DP e handycam .....

Questa frase è sbagliata, perché: per le grandi case di produzione il costo della fotocamera e degli obiettivi è marginale rispetto al costo totale!

0,n

https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/955315/Avengers-Infinity-War-money-most-expensive-marvel-movie

8 minutes ago, DBounce said:

But I think this is more to do with the person behind the camera than the camera. I would have little doubt they could have achieved similar results with any number of cameras. 

I think this statement is right, a good job but nothing special.

27 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Most viewed thread in 2 weeks ever on EOSHD about a camera launch

https://www.eoshd.com/2018/04/blackmagic-pocket-4k-watched-camera-launch-ever-eoshd/

I would wait for when the camera comes out to evaluate !!!

3 hours ago, jonpais said:

Now I am going to shake it and throw it against the wall.  

maybe it does not depend on Davinci, but on your computer ...
if I were you I would try to download the latest free version !!!

sure that this camera is ugly

17 minutes ago, mercer said:

Ora se solo i produttori di Hollywood Line stavano leggendo questo thread, allora ogni film da questo punto in poi potrebbe essere girato su un (inserire la fotocamera del consumatore qui)

It makes no sense

GH2 and LOMO...

My personal opinion: It does not seem so cheap to be 1.86 m4/3 crop!!!

22 hours ago, Damphousse said:

Uhhh ... Sì. Penso che tu abbia dimostrato il nostro punto. Non stiamo sicuramente cercando di seguire la via italiana. Nonostante i migliori sforzi dell'Orange Führer, alcuni di noi in America vorrebbero conservare almeno uno straccio della nostra antica dignità.

 

But only Berlusconi with George W. Bush is true...the rest is fake :-)

however I can not understand all this excitement for this stupid boy.
Where I live, it is the same Italian state that publishes killings, people laughing for the dead after a tragedy, and much more, without any restraint or compassion !!!

Example:

On 14/1/2018 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Reid said:

Panasonic will soon(ish?!) send me a GH5S to play with so I’ll check it out.

If you have time, you can do a gh5s test with a Lomo
vs Sony s35

23 hours ago, Vesku said:

Is the GH5S brighter or darker at same exposure and iso than GH5 or Sony?

The new Star Wars movie in 4k theater has added noise which looks like GH5 iso1600-3200.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2527336/technical?ref_=tt_dt_spec

@Andrew Reid  you did tests with s35 lenses.

On 20/12/2017 at 7:17 PM, PannySVHS said:

better at what? ultra low light, well that is nothing Godfather or other Bmovies were shot at. Not even the King of Darkness, Gordon Willis shot at ultra low light. Panasonic is not late at all. All their video orientated DSLMs have been top notch. GH5 will show less artefacts in low light but more noise. Which of the two looks more "filmic"? I say, noise over artefacts any time.

you've got it wrong.

Meanwhile, now a Sony a7rII is easily found at 1900 euros ( 2200 NEW) in Europe.
We must see if Panasonic is better than the Sony BSi at s35 ...
but I think that Panasonic has come late ...

for me, little light depends on whether the sun is not yet high in the sky, or if you have lit too few light bulbs...or it's night...

@Neumann film

 my opinion: that is beautiful lens.

12 hours ago, IronFilm said:

Se sei incapace di fare una matematica molto semplice al volo, allora hai problemi più grandi nella tua vita rispetto all'utilizzo di MFT vs S35

Lord, I have not offended nor given the incapable of anyone, in Italy for an offense in the press like this one risks the criminal conviction ...
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffamazione

Also for the trick (incorrect video) forget to have the quality of image that is proposed to us!

Price in Euro

That anyway then you have to calculate the sensor differences with the lenses.
That is, it is true that between S35 and m4 / 3 there is little difference ... but I work
with S35 sensor and s35 lenses it's all another work ...

https://www.abelcine.com/fov/

49.6 mm:  http://i65.tinypic.com/azcpqr.png

If the sensor is not s35, I do not see professional operators to make mathematical operations with focal ... I think it's just low light oriented to counter A7S series

On 4/11/2017 at 3:37 PM, Don Kotlos said:

? I find the video side of A7rIII was improved far more than the still side. The A7sIII will only add 4k 60p, better 4K FF quality and maybe a 10bit output. 

1) I use manual cine lens (autofocus only for photos)

2) Sgammut3.cine is not indispensable, color science is what it is !!!

3) and 4)  little difference

5) - 6) - 7) EVF from A9 - Better ergonomics  - At least double the battery life !!!!!!!!!!!!! something had to be done

8) S35/FF switch with a button!  this is very good!

9) Bright LCD during 4K recording - USB3.1 tranfers - Dual SD card - Improved FF quality - Improved IBIS - Proxy recording!       I use Shogun Inferno!!! gimbal and post production...

I would be very happy that they would do A7SIII with sensor S35, but I do not think they do it

What a disappointment, no news on the video side ...

I can not decide between OST 801 or 802, what is your advice?