Jump to content

ssrdd

Members
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

Posts posted by ssrdd

  1. 4k 400mbps is lie or clic bait from initial advertisements

    4k 60fps is 8bit in year 2017

    2k 240fps is cropped with 8bit in year 2017

    5.7k resolution is God knows when upgrade and not internal

    2500 ISO max usable

    No Autofocus

     

    How cool is it for calling 7500/- cheap!

     

    I think after canon, Panasonic started smoking same shit in my opinion. Overall its a marketing gimmick in year 2017.

  2. 2 hours ago, jonpais said:

    Any reason why it should cost less? Do you believe Canon isn't offering enough features for the money, or is it your budget constraints? Because we all dream stuff cost less. I'd like Sigma to charge $2,000 for their cine lenses, but that ain't happening anytime soon. I'm not taking sides, I've got no intention of picking up a cinema camera anytime soon, but it seems to me that the C200B is a great deal at only $5,999.00 USD.

     

    Sir, I am comparing this camera with Ursamini due to RAW codec. yes it has good auto focusing, great color out of the box. But there is no 10bit codec internally which is more important than having Light RAW for me. All this can be achived under 5k with Gh5+atomos. Offering Duel pixel focus is the only new thing this segment. For me its not worth paying 2 or 3 grand extra just for Auto focus and never used Video autofocsing for any job by far. I am neither sides panasonc or canon. I just feel its not worth it. 

     

    I agree for some of the photgraphers who got into videography after long time spending in still/autofocus industry, may be they rely on. 

  3. Panasonic cant do proper focus in gh5 video mode. Its stupid to expect auto focus on their semi pro video cameras. They just cant do. Panasonic varicam Lt might have good image but its bulky for what it offers and cropped 240fps has big diapponiting noise levels, only if they come sony[fs7] or canon[c300] battery style and decent  slomo video with out crop and no rebooting during the shoots and great focussing abilities can only save what ever the camera they release. other wise we will wait for 2018 cinegear or 2019,20,21,22[like canon] NAB if not we may not wait and move on to something. 

  4. [color=#000000]
    Everything is imperfect.[/color][color=#000000]
    RX1 = too expensive
    A99 = Bad, worst and shit 28mbps in video( why not ALL-I compression)???
    VG900 = lack of FF NEX lenses + Bad, worst and shit 28mbps in video( why not ALL-I compression)?????[/color][color=#000000]
    loser…[/color]
    [color=#000000]
    Sony,[/color][color=#000000]
    Do you really think u can sell AVCHD SHIT ?????[/color][color=#000000]
    dont think so.[/color]
  5. [quote name='EOSHD' timestamp='1346248377' post='16817']
    I hear you. It is a lot of money for me too, I don't need an FS100 AND a C100, AND a GH3, AND a BMD. It is getting silly. The investment is better off on the screen. Although the C100 is getting much warmer for me, and has addressed a heap of concerns I had about Canon recently, I cannot see myself selling my FS100 for it purely because of the lens mount and the fact I can use the Blackmagic for optimal resolution and workflow in good light. FS100 is my low light tool and for when S35 sensor size is important. BMD for when dynamic range, skin tones, resolution is key. C100 would be nicer than both to handle, and a lovely cam for sure but it cannot replace either of them until it has a universal mount and raw codec. That is asking a lot. FS100 and BMD both have better unique selling points for me personally.

    I know the majority might be better off with a C100 for commercial work though. It is going to FLY off the shelves because it is well priced and very practical.

    Not quite exciting enough in the specs department though. No 240fps, no raw, no 12bit colour, no full frame. Sony and Blackmagic have all that covered under $8k.
    [/quote]

    [color=#282828][font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]it is well priced and very practical?????????!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF[/font][/color]
    [font="helvetica, arial, sans-serif"][color="#282828"]u definitely sound like new.[/color][/font]
  6. [quote name='HurtinMinorKey' timestamp='1346256993' post='16846']
    c 500:

    [url="http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/Canon-launches-Cinema-EOS-System-flagship-camera?cid=%20scfb120860"]http://www.canon.com...cid= scfb120860[/url]

    60fps 4K 10bit raw
    [/quote]

    With an external recorder, it doesnt sound any great.
×
×
  • Create New...