Subforums
16,725 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.2m views
-
- 1.7k replies
- 347.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 7k views
-
- 42 replies
- 802 views
-
- 443 replies
- 31.1k views
-
- 1k replies
- 123.3k views
-
- 327 replies
- 72.4k views
-
- 39 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 17 replies
- 349 views
-
- 40 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 418 views
-
- 0 replies
- 73 views
-
- 235 replies
- 14.9k views
-
- 52 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 164 views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 53 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 890 views
-
- 78 replies
- 13.4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 5k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 473 replies
- 123.8k views
-
- 55 replies
- 9.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 461 views
-
- 0 replies
- 175 views
-
- 19 replies
- 860 views
-
- 10 replies
- 975 views
-
- 0 replies
- 298 views
-
- 23 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 216 replies
- 23.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 36 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 66 replies
- 24.6k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics16.7k
-
Total Posts338k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By eatstoomuchjam · Posted
If you're looking for SOOC color, you probably want a decent amount of SOOC noise reduction. If you're working on a project which will have reasonable post-production work done, you want the least (or no) noise reduction in camera. Tools like the denoiser in Resolve, Neat Video, and Topaz Video AI give a better result as well as giving you a lot more control of the trade-offs of noise vs lost details and plastic/wax skin. -
I just watched the gold rush 1925. where is the 24p magic? why am I still enjoying the story and composition and action such much? lol. -
By Llaasseerr · Posted
I had a chance to test this, it does look like the extra green shadow noise introduced by the new autofocus is somewhat reduced by shooting at the higher base ISO 4000 if the situation allows for it. So shooting with an ND could work. -
I read that clog2 has slightly more DR than clog3 but that in clog2 the NR is turned down/off and the shadows are way noisier than clog3. How do you guys see that trade-off? worth it? or would you have rather reduce noise in post. -
Below is an approximate comparison of transfer curve for various Log and Sony's three versions of HLG. From the Bolex PDF above: The three versions of HLG that Sony cameras support (from https://xtremestuff.net/sony-and-hybrid-log-gamma-hlg/ ) - HLG3 (upper curve) is the closest to the Rec. 2100 standard : A chart of various Log formats from https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64243940 (note the 3 EV spread in the high EV limit between the various curves). The highest DR curves look to be C-Log2, S-Log3 and V-Log - but of course they do that by being flatter in the important mid-range area i.e. fewer levels per EV, increasing the chance of banding if pushed too far in post. Note this chart is -10 to +10 EV vs. IRE 0 to 110%, the other two are -8 to +8 EV vs. 10-bit digital code values.
-
