ANAMORPHIC
The largest online community devoted to anamorphic filmmaking.
Discuss lenses, adapters, workflows and post lenses for sale
2,208 topics in this forum
-
- 9 replies
- 1,402 views
-
- 1 reply
- 644 views
-
- 0 replies
- 246 views
-
- 0 replies
- 212 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1,959 views
-
- 3 replies
- 520 views
-
- 18 replies
- 3,627 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,149 views
-
- 3 replies
- 617 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1,702 views
-
- 5 replies
- 411 views
-
- 3 replies
- 300 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1,108 views
-
- 0 replies
- 285 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,687 views
-
- 23 replies
- 2,688 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1,011 views
-
- 7 replies
- 976 views
-
- 1 reply
- 425 views
-
- 0 replies
- 242 views
-
- 0 replies
- 343 views
-
- 0 replies
- 306 views
-
- 4 replies
- 826 views
-
- 1 reply
- 389 views
-
- 0 replies
- 384 views
-
- 3 replies
- 359 views
-
- 1 reply
- 261 views
-
- 1 reply
- 427 views
-
- 2 replies
- 343 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1,073 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,043 views
-
- 4 replies
- 530 views
-
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1,541 views
-
- 6 replies
- 864 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics14,834
-
Total Posts252,256
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By MeanRevert · Posted
Hey fellas - Question for ya. I've always broadly managed exposure by using zebras and the histogram to try to keep things things in the middle whilst also minimizing clipping. Now, I'm just starting to learn false color and it looks to be a great one-stop shop tool. My question is.. if I were to put up an 18% grey card, should it be falling around 50% to indicate proper exposure? -
By MeanRevert · Posted
Only because someone brought up the XT-3 again and I just moved from that platform, I'd say it has the best image coming SOC. Set that thing to Eterna or Classic Chrome, transcode to ProRes and then do your thing in Resolve or Premiere. -
I'd say there's really no reason to afraid of look of BM files straight out of camera: it is just one click operation to "normalized" them without any exotic manipulation: there's already native BM lut and, say, equally nice free CaptainHook's lut and - voila, footage will look (pretty obviously) better SOC (to say true) than that of "natural" profile of GH5's. Unfortunately, I have no Fuji XT3 to say the same with ground of personal experience... So, please, hurry to buy P4K, play with it and I'm sure that @Kisaha will help you in trouble to get rid of it if you find yourself disappointed -
By Jonesy Jones · Posted
@Sage, how certain are you that you will be creating your lut for the P4K? The colors for the gh5 are so good that I am constantly tempted to keep it instead of the p4k. I don't know how you'd feel about this, but since I have both I wonder if I could shoot with both cams to create a temporary fake gha lut until yours comes out. -
To me, the P4K is usable up to ISO 10,000. It also cleans up really nicely when you use noise reduction in Resolve. I think that the GH5s is a bit better in low light, probably something like 1/3 - 2/3 of a stop. I don't have the Fuji, but I think it is probably about a stop better than the P4K from the footage that I have seen and from my usage of the GH5s & P4K. For great low light, get the Sony cameras (e.g. A7III) their engineers used magic pixie dust in those things
-
-
Topics
-
