RAW SHOOTING CAMERAS
ALL THINGS RAW! Cameras including Blackmagic and codecs like ProRes RAW and BRAW. Accessories like external recorders and workflows including raw compatible NLEs.
479 topics in this forum
-
- 623 replies
- 241,378 views
-
- 264 replies
- 426,021 views
-
- 48 replies
- 5,673 views
-
- 2 replies
- 461 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1,210 views
-
- 3 replies
- 334 views
-
- 1 reply
- 329 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,152 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,637 views
-
- 25 replies
- 12,199 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,442 views
-
- 0 replies
- 606 views
-
- 2 replies
- 633 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1,966 views
-
- 35 replies
- 8,678 views
-
- 1 reply
- 925 views
-
- 1 reply
- 761 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,216 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1,776 views
-
- 0 replies
- 606 views
-
- 1 reply
- 939 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,474 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,353 views
-
- 25 replies
- 11,776 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1,765 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,309 views
-
- 7 replies
- 2,306 views
-
- 5 replies
- 7,316 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,412 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,731 views
-
- 11 replies
- 2,373 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1,827 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1,405 views
-
- 7 replies
- 2,118 views
-
- 15 replies
- 3,330 views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics15,704
-
Total Posts281,649
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Lars Steenhoff · Posted
Mm, I think your right, I got confused with video for a moment -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
Indeed, but you don't need to do this trick for video as the exposure is consistent in Cine M mode. Only stills. Unless you are doing a timelapse in stills mode or something? -
Take it, you will like it! However be aware that ZE lenses don't have an aperture ring. On EF bodies you control it from the camera, but if you want to use it on multiple bodies, it would be better to take the ZF lenses. I don't know about prices in the states, but for the European market that price is quite a bargain. Even if you don't need the lens, take and resell it for a profit on ebay. Personally, instead of the 35mm I went with the 28mm f2, which, besides giving you a slightly larger field of view, it has also close focusing capabilities, more than the 35mm. -
By currensheldon · Posted
Yes, agreed that Fuji should fully embrace their APS-C/Super35 sensor size and go all in on the things that are harder for full-frame to do: make affordable cinema and video cameras that are compact and travel well that are packed full of features 2-3 years before they make it into full-frame cameras. The GH5 did this 2-3 years before the S1H came out. Still nobody has topped it for 10-bit 422 internal 4K outside of Panasonic itself and the $6500 1DX III. I LOVE the Super35 sensor size as long as there are lenses that are made specifically for it. Fuji has tons of those. The Canon EF mount is frustrating because if you want a stabilized 24-70mm f2.8 for doc work, the only lens that is close is their 17-55mm and it vignettes in DCI 4k and 2k. Sony has some, but underwhelming in general. Definitely think Fuji needs to get into the video game big time in some way. Why not a Canon XC-15-esque model with 2 mini-xlrs and inernal NDs and an X-Mount? Or a Fuji X-H2 that has all the features of the S1H but with great AF and internal NDs? And then an FS5-like video camera for doc-oriented projects with IBIS and 12-bit codecs. They definitely have an opportunity to continue to do what they are doing and offer something different, rather than just go full-frame like everyone else. -
By Andrew Reid · Posted
You can't freeze time or be satisfied for very long, where's the fun in that... Always chasing knowledge, perfection, performance is what this forum is about. I find it fascinating that the image in ProRes RAW on the Z6 has the weird attributes it does compared to the internal H.264. I guess that makes me a camera nerd. So be it.
-
-
Topics
-
