<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony HX9v vs Canon 600D &#8211; DSLR gets beat by compact in video mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode</link>
	<description>The DSLR video and digital filmmaking blog &#124; Reviews &#124; News &#124; Technique</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johngriswell</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>johngriswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you using to transcode the MTS file from the Hx9v on a Mac?  FCP X and iMovie 11 won&#039;t import/convert and I tried a few free programs with no luck.  End work flow if though FCP X mixed with GH2.

Thanks,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you using to transcode the MTS file from the Hx9v on a Mac?  FCP X and iMovie 11 won&#8217;t import/convert and I tried a few free programs with no luck.  End work flow if though FCP X mixed with GH2.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swemba</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>swemba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I have to say is $350.00.
There is no argument.  Anything you can say in defense of Canon probably isn&#039;t even worth the hundreds of dollars difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is $350.00.<br />
There is no argument.  Anything you can say in defense of Canon probably isn&#8217;t even worth the hundreds of dollars difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EOSHD</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>EOSHD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes it is a good b-camera for the GH2, can intercut seamlessly. It&#039;s close on resolution, not quite as detailed but you can&#039;t tell the difference unless pixel peeping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is a good b-camera for the GH2, can intercut seamlessly. It&#8217;s close on resolution, not quite as detailed but you can&#8217;t tell the difference unless pixel peeping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philmyself</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Philmyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s impressive ! I&#039;d be curious to see how it matches with gh2 ! I&#039;ll try to get one by myself and do the test... Could be a good B-camera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s impressive ! I&#8217;d be curious to see how it matches with gh2 ! I&#8217;ll try to get one by myself and do the test&#8230; Could be a good B-camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tcarretti</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>tcarretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, got something up that I shot today.  

This is straight out of the camera with no CC.  I shot it at 1080p60 and then edited in a 720p24 timeline so I could try out the slow motion.  I&#039;m really liking this little camera!

http://www.vimeo.com/25151569

Original files look fantastic, wish I could figure out a better setting for rendering to do them justice.

Thanks for looking!  This camera is a great deal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, got something up that I shot today.  </p>
<p>This is straight out of the camera with no CC.  I shot it at 1080p60 and then edited in a 720p24 timeline so I could try out the slow motion.  I&#8217;m really liking this little camera!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/25151569" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/25151569</a></p>
<p>Original files look fantastic, wish I could figure out a better setting for rendering to do them justice.</p>
<p>Thanks for looking!  This camera is a great deal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tcarretti</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>tcarretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just now finally found one at best buy! Gonna get charged this afternoon and can&#039;t wait to try it out. Will be able to compare it to my gh1(7), gh2, and my panasonic sdt750 which also shoots 1080p60... Woohoo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just now finally found one at best buy! Gonna get charged this afternoon and can&#8217;t wait to try it out. Will be able to compare it to my gh1(7), gh2, and my panasonic sdt750 which also shoots 1080p60&#8230; Woohoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natums</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>natums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dig it. Great review. and I have done that exact thing with my T2i with a 24-105, security is just finally catching onto the fact that it&#039;s a video camera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig it. Great review. and I have done that exact thing with my T2i with a 24-105, security is just finally catching onto the fact that it&#8217;s a video camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeen</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the great review! Amazing little camera it is. Just got one and fooled around with it. 

I like the &#039;action IS&#039; although you still have to make smooth movements to avoid jerky stuff in your video. How many stops do you turn the EV down (in normal conditions) to make it look good? One or two? It&#039;s a pity the HX9 doesn&#039;t remember your last settings...

I&#039;m not a big fan of &#039;auto-whitening&#039;. But the HX9 gives you the possibility to turn &#039;ISO&#039; on and choose you&#039;re own colour-temperature, &#039;daylight&#039; seems to fine in most normal conditions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great review! Amazing little camera it is. Just got one and fooled around with it. </p>
<p>I like the &#8216;action IS&#8217; although you still have to make smooth movements to avoid jerky stuff in your video. How many stops do you turn the EV down (in normal conditions) to make it look good? One or two? It&#8217;s a pity the HX9 doesn&#8217;t remember your last settings&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of &#8216;auto-whitening&#8217;. But the HX9 gives you the possibility to turn &#8216;ISO&#8217; on and choose you&#8217;re own colour-temperature, &#8216;daylight&#8217; seems to fine in most normal conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an owner of the Sony HX9 and professional video cameras like the recent Canon XF100 and Sony EX1 I can say without doubt that there is no need to buy a consumer HD camcorder. 

This is the first pocket HD camcorder / camera combined that does a brilliant job in both fields. I also have the HX5 which is amazing but the HX9 adds better microphone positioning ( sound is still its weakest point ) and the amazing image stabilisation. 

I have a number of high end digital camcorders and cameras and when I feel like going out and actually enjoying myself at the same time as recording the event it is very difficult not to just take the HX9 knowing I&#039;ll get great photos and video which everyone will think is excellent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an owner of the Sony HX9 and professional video cameras like the recent Canon XF100 and Sony EX1 I can say without doubt that there is no need to buy a consumer HD camcorder. </p>
<p>This is the first pocket HD camcorder / camera combined that does a brilliant job in both fields. I also have the HX5 which is amazing but the HX9 adds better microphone positioning ( sound is still its weakest point ) and the amazing image stabilisation. </p>
<p>I have a number of high end digital camcorders and cameras and when I feel like going out and actually enjoying myself at the same time as recording the event it is very difficult not to just take the HX9 knowing I&#8217;ll get great photos and video which everyone will think is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EOSHD</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>EOSHD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for linking here Joe. Enjoyed your site, the depth of the info is great. It is true Canon have been taking baby steps with just about every camera line recently which is why they&#039;re being overtaken by Sony and Panasonic in terms of innovative features. Also there are signs Canon&#039;s image quality is slipping behind as well. I&#039;m thinking GH2 versus 60D, 7D, etc. at least in video mode, even at ISO 3200. If it wasn&#039;t for the larger APS-C sensor in the Canon it would lose in RAW stills mode as well, meanwhile Sony&#039;s NEX CMOS sensors have now caught up with Canon on low light performance, whereas 2 years ago there was a world of difference.

Not sure why they are letting their standards slip, maybe complacency from continued strong sales and saving the best for big updates every 3 years?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking here Joe. Enjoyed your site, the depth of the info is great. It is true Canon have been taking baby steps with just about every camera line recently which is why they&#8217;re being overtaken by Sony and Panasonic in terms of innovative features. Also there are signs Canon&#8217;s image quality is slipping behind as well. I&#8217;m thinking GH2 versus 60D, 7D, etc. at least in video mode, even at ISO 3200. If it wasn&#8217;t for the larger APS-C sensor in the Canon it would lose in RAW stills mode as well, meanwhile Sony&#8217;s NEX CMOS sensors have now caught up with Canon on low light performance, whereas 2 years ago there was a world of difference.</p>
<p>Not sure why they are letting their standards slip, maybe complacency from continued strong sales and saving the best for big updates every 3 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rommex</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>rommex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ercan, you are quite wrong.

bitrate is basically quantity of memory that codec needs to put one second of video. bitrate depends very much on which codec, which settings you use and what kind of picture you encode. DVD has very high bitrate, but nobody uses DVDs now, because modern processors using modern algorythm can pac the same quality picture with less memory needed.

I&#039;m not a fan of Sony, at all, but if their new processor and codec modification can do better with less bitrate, it&#039;s quite possible and quite plausible.

please before writing such long meaningless letter, check some data first.

cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ercan, you are quite wrong.</p>
<p>bitrate is basically quantity of memory that codec needs to put one second of video. bitrate depends very much on which codec, which settings you use and what kind of picture you encode. DVD has very high bitrate, but nobody uses DVDs now, because modern processors using modern algorythm can pac the same quality picture with less memory needed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of Sony, at all, but if their new processor and codec modification can do better with less bitrate, it&#8217;s quite possible and quite plausible.</p>
<p>please before writing such long meaningless letter, check some data first.</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecosta</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>joecosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew, this is Joe from the http://hx9v.blogspot.com blog

Glad you like the HX9V so much and do your own testing and comparison.
Reading through all the comments her some info.
The V in the Sony cameras stands for GPS. In countries where GPS is not allowed they sell the models like HX5 etc instead of HX5V.
Last as I checked Canon video they still used an extremely space wasting audio codec what gobbles up a good part of the bandwith.
I also tested the Olympus SZ 30MR (link at my blog) and it is a pretty awful camera, but you can compare my findings for yourself. 

I also did some pixel level comparison with the Sony HX9V vs Panasonic ZS10 / TZ20 vs Canon SX220 / SX230 vs Nikon D7000 vs Sony A55 and NEX-5 vs Panasonic GH2 at my blog and the results were quite eye opening about actual resolution and quality captured. 

As to Canon vs Sony, I come from an A60 and S2IS and with these cameras Cannon was very leading in features and quality but since then there are mostly baby steps in evolution so this is why I ended up to replace these cameras with Sony models (HX1 and HX5V) and blog the max info out of these versatile pieces of engineering to fully understand the potential.

As to the need of manual video mode, in all the extreme situation videos I captured with the HX5 there was never a situation where when watching the result I was thinking that any manual option would have resulted in a better clip except for white balance indoors but that has improved drastically in the HX9V.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, this is Joe from the <a href="http://hx9v.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://hx9v.blogspot.com</a> blog</p>
<p>Glad you like the HX9V so much and do your own testing and comparison.<br />
Reading through all the comments her some info.<br />
The V in the Sony cameras stands for GPS. In countries where GPS is not allowed they sell the models like HX5 etc instead of HX5V.<br />
Last as I checked Canon video they still used an extremely space wasting audio codec what gobbles up a good part of the bandwith.<br />
I also tested the Olympus SZ 30MR (link at my blog) and it is a pretty awful camera, but you can compare my findings for yourself. </p>
<p>I also did some pixel level comparison with the Sony HX9V vs Panasonic ZS10 / TZ20 vs Canon SX220 / SX230 vs Nikon D7000 vs Sony A55 and NEX-5 vs Panasonic GH2 at my blog and the results were quite eye opening about actual resolution and quality captured. </p>
<p>As to Canon vs Sony, I come from an A60 and S2IS and with these cameras Cannon was very leading in features and quality but since then there are mostly baby steps in evolution so this is why I ended up to replace these cameras with Sony models (HX1 and HX5V) and blog the max info out of these versatile pieces of engineering to fully understand the potential.</p>
<p>As to the need of manual video mode, in all the extreme situation videos I captured with the HX5 there was never a situation where when watching the result I was thinking that any manual option would have resulted in a better clip except for white balance indoors but that has improved drastically in the HX9V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EOSHD</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>EOSHD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recommend Adobe Premiere CS5 for editing AVCHD, it does it natively. Alternatively you&#039;ll need to convert the AVCHD files to ProRes or similar. I don&#039;t recommend iMovie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend Adobe Premiere CS5 for editing AVCHD, it does it natively. Alternatively you&#8217;ll need to convert the AVCHD files to ProRes or similar. I don&#8217;t recommend iMovie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranenyau</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>ranenyau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Andrew
Thanks for your recommendation and just bought one. I have both Mac and PC, which software can I use to edit the AVCHD movies and slow motion effect? It seems that iMovie is unable to upload AVCHD.
Thanks
Ranen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrew<br />
Thanks for your recommendation and just bought one. I have both Mac and PC, which software can I use to edit the AVCHD movies and slow motion effect? It seems that iMovie is unable to upload AVCHD.<br />
Thanks<br />
Ranen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EOSHD</title>
		<link>http://www.eoshd.com/content/2930/sony-hx9v-vs-canon-600d-dslr-gets-beat-by-compact-in-video-mode#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>EOSHD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eoshd.com/?p=2930#comment-621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know this, will check. It only has a CCD sensor though so it&#039;s not fast enough to support 60p or 1080p. It has 720p only.

The sensor is also a bit noisier than the Canon S95 and G12 judging buy the RAW stills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know this, will check. It only has a CCD sensor though so it&#8217;s not fast enough to support 60p or 1080p. It has 720p only.</p>
<p>The sensor is also a bit noisier than the Canon S95 and G12 judging buy the RAW stills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
