Jump to content

Is it just me or is the A7sii Stills pretty sweet?


Mattias Burling
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Super Members

Like most Ive read about 1000 comments saying "a7rii if you also want to shoot stills and a7sii for video only".
Since I mostly use medium format film for stills I couldn't care less, but ultimately went for the S because I wanted minimum moire.

But I do use Instagram and take some photos around the family and for that I could use any camera really. So I have taken a few with the a7sii.  
And I must say... wow.

I think they look stellar. I cant really put my finger on it exactly but they have an "organic feel" (lack of better word) that's very pleasing imo.


My theory is that its the low 15mega pixels on a large sensor. I guess it takes away the "digital" sharpness in the same way as the HD vs 4K thing. And also how a full sensor read often is more pleasing than a binned down sample. I see the same in the NX500 4k crop vs the NX1 6K down sample.

Here is an example compared to the D750 which has a very high megapixel. Bot are nice but I think the less sharp a7sii is nicer.

A7sii
IMG_20160221_145429_resized.md.jpg

D750
IMG_20151011_124052.md.jpg

The pic above as well as the once bellow are almost straight from the camera. Standard jpegs. I might have added a vignette or so but no "Insta filters".
Im not claiming to be a good photographer or anything, but what I like is how there is tons of detail without the "digital sharpness".

IMG_20160221_005918_resized.md.jpg

IMG_20160219_221750_resized.md.jpg

On this I added some sharpening.
IMG_20160222_091705_resized.md.jpg

So anyone else seen the same thing?
Anyone have any stills to share?

(Could be my mind playing a trick on me to justify the quite hefty price on the a7sii, even though I got a 10% discount )

 

At the end of the day I think it will serve me well for most pics and when I need something "richer" I use good old Kodak :)

13040304233_f32d5f18f0_z.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Unless you make a side by side comparison it's hard to tell from those tiny pics ;) Old CCD sensors with few megapixels and without olfp filter (like 22mp MF digital backs) give a very sharp image, large pixels ,sharp lenses,no pixelblur. Maybe it's something like that.

What really interests me about the a7sii is the fullwell capacity. I wonder if you could do a comparison between the d750 and the a7sii where you have a blown cloudy sky in the background and then recover it, maybe the a7sii gives some surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members
20 minutes ago, araucaria said:

But it's kind of strange to talk about the sharpness of cameras and then compare linear 1300pixel reductions from 4000-6000 pixels

I see it. That was my question, Im I alone in doing so.
The answer seems to be yes, since at least you don't see it.
I also asked  for other users of the A7sii opinion regarding their stills. So my stills don't need to be full res for the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members
8 minutes ago, agolex said:

Well, the S II stills are nice, the R II ones are much better, though. :D

Its the word "better" that Im wondering about. If they are better in that they are sharper and more digital, it would mean that they to my eye are worse.

I've used the D800, D750, A7, A7ii alot. All with high resolution. But Im not so sure I can call them better.

Would be sweet if someone that has both the A7sii/rii could to a stills side by side.

Not of charts, couldnt care less, but of people and objects. Also with wide open lens, soft lens, etc.

Want to see the "feel" if that makes sence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members
31 minutes ago, araucaria said:

I can do some comparison shots of the D3 and D800, maybe you can see it in the D3/d700 Files too ;) Should I give it a shot?

I guess that should show if its the few but large pixels on a full frame that gives the look. So if its not to much trouble... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't get the focus and framing identical, but here goes. :p It's just that with the R I often notice the better resolution, especially at night with long exposures. But it's hard to really pick what's better, there's always the variance of settings/framing and shit involved, as well. In the examples I just shot I found the colors of the S better, it picked the White Balance differently, as well (readjusted that for the R in Lightroom). All in all, I don't know, I'd rather not spend too much time with stuff like this, because there's so much variables involved and I like both cameras. For stills I usually go with the R, just because of the better AF and the plus in resolution and for video I prefer the S for full frame 4K and for lower light scenarios, because it's always so clean.

Image 1 + 2 f8 (both 1600 ISO, 1/160, standard, no PP, matched WB), first a7sii, second a7rii.

Image 3 + 4 f1.8 (both 1/160, standard, no PP, matched WB), first a7sii 125 ISO, second a7rii 100 ISO. Lens: Zeiss 55 1.8, S uncompressed raw, R compressed raw (should have matched that but forgot). Edit: Tried both uncompressed and compressed and there's no visible difference.

 

vaders8ap1600iso.jpg

vaderr8ap1600iso.jpg

vaders18ap125iso.jpg

vaderr18ap100iso.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my calibrated LG 99 % AdobeRGB screen the S colors actually look more accurate (before the jpeg fuckup). Nothing major, though. And apparently WB values work differently between the cameras, because in the screengrab below I didn't match the WB and it's more similar.

 

comp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members

Great, thanks.

On the images 1 and 2 the difference that is somewhat explaining what I saw for in example my pick of the Nx500 on the slider.
In image 2 there is a grainy/noisy texture on his legs and arms where as it on image 1 is smooth.

EDIT: I asked a graphic designer, a copy writer and a fellow producer to have a look. We watched full size.
I asked them to ignore WB and composition and focus on which camera they wanted to own.

Image 1 won.

Now what that survey shows.... is of course absolutely nothing. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:

Great, thanks.

On the images 1 and 2 the difference that is somewhat explaining what I saw for in example my pick of the Nx500 on the slider.
In image 2 there is a grainy/noisy texture on his this where as it on image 1 is smooth.

Yw. Can't see anything of the sort on either the jpegs or the raws. I can send you the raws if you'd like me to, just don't want to post Dropbox links in public. You might wanna work on that sentence, though, as I'm not sure if I understood correctly. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members
3 minutes ago, agolex said:

Yw. Can't see anything of the sort on either the jpegs or the raws. I can send you the raws if you'd like me to, just don't want to post Dropbox links in public. You might wanna work on that sentence, though, as I'm not sure if I understood correctly. :D

What I ment was: Image 1 = Smooth. Image 2 = Noise :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, rechecked and I think I see what you mean now. On Vader the noise patterns are different. Thing is that the focus is different as well. I'll do it again with better matched focus. And of course the S is supposed to be better in lower light, it's 1600 ISO after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Super Members
9 minutes ago, agolex said:

Ah, rechecked and I think I see what you mean now. On Vader the noise patterns are different. Thing is that the focus is different as well. I'll do it again with better matched focus. And of course the S is supposed to be better in lower light, it's 1600 ISO after all.

Could also be as simple as wider DR beeing more "real" to my brains interpretation of the image.

In the same way high DR have been voted sharper than high resolution in focus groups. Thats why TV stations here are more into bit depth and DR than 4K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...