I'm noticing all of these raw cameras seem to be designed by software designers who can use solidworks rather than industrial designers who know how things work in the real world, in the physical domain. Surely they could have made the whole thing longer and thinner, with some way to hold the damn thing. no matter what rig this is fitted to, this will remain a 'tripod mount only' setup just like the BMCC.
Lets see some ergonomics and great design rather than silly specs that try to compete against cameras most of us would just hire if we need them.
The reason this will be so cheap is that no real industrial designer was employed to do a proper job of designing the product itself (in a physical sense). Numerous other corners and oversights will have been made. Granted I bet the pictures out of this thing look nice though.
well i don`t think industrial designers are involved in any "cinema grade" camera development on the market.
jim jannard`s intention on the epic was to make it look cool, but that guy never spend a day on set shooting.... and you see and feel that if you have to use his cameras..
alexa is a heavy shoebox with the display on the wrong side etc..
and sony just copied that design for the f5 + f55... but with the display on the right side this time!... the rest.. BOX
do you really sit straight behind the camera on lens hight? then the bmcc monitor is placed there especially for you...
you can clearly see that mainboards are square on all these camera "designs" :-)
so i don`t think that design plays a major role on the price.
11.5 stops bother me, the design flaws will be something you just have to live with..... as always....