Test footage from the pre-release Panasonic GH3 at Photokina
#1
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:18 PM
This week I was loaned a GH3 body for a short time at Photokna by Panasonic. This test footage was shot in 1080/25p ALL-I mode at 72Mbit, with two slow mo-sequences of Pocahontas and the juggler shot in AVCHD 1080/50p at 50Mbit.
I also had a go at grading the GH3 footage with Peter Patten of Apple.
#2
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:33 PM
Highlights look kinda iffy. Not sure about this extended dynamic range talk. I guess we'll have to see a proper objective comparison with the GH2.
#3
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:51 PM
#4
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:56 PM
its a unique camera!!
- Steven Phipps likes this
#5
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:03 AM
- acmeman likes this
#6
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:03 AM
- Steven Phipps likes this
#7
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:03 AM
#8
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:05 AM
I wouldn't call it a "professional" codec though. High bitrate, yes. But 8bit 420 is still 8bit 420 and unfortunately this is the deal w/ the HDMI out :-( Not liking that, but the picture looks good thus far :-)
- acmeman likes this
#9
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:07 AM
#10
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:07 AM
#11
Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:52 AM
I just don't see what the naysayers are going on about.
The detail is horrible and it renders textures like a 7D (everything looks plastic). The GH3 looks, unfortunately, like a disgusting leap backwards in image rendering. It's just another fake 1080p camera like the rest now. Terrible job Panasonic, terrible.
#12
Posted 22 September 2012 - 01:28 AM
- acmeman likes this
#13
Posted 22 September 2012 - 01:35 AM
The detail is horrible and it renders textures like a 7D (everything looks plastic). The GH3 looks, unfortunately, like a disgusting leap backwards in image rendering. It's just another fake 1080p camera like the rest now. Terrible job Panasonic, terrible.
Too funny... I've seen a lot of 7D footage on projects I've worked and it is mostly shit, this is not soft 7D shit. In fact it looks great considering some of the horrible ceiling lighting that abounds. The only area of concern I have is the last few frames where the guys shirt lights up with moire, that is not going to be acceptable on my shoots. If it is not just a bug specific to certain lenses they definitely need to upgrade that low pass filter or there will be alot of product returns on this model, mine included.
- acmeman likes this
#14
Posted 22 September 2012 - 01:38 AM
The detail is horrible and it renders textures like a 7D (everything looks plastic). The GH3 looks, unfortunately, like a disgusting leap backwards in image rendering. It's just another fake 1080p camera like the rest now. Terrible job Panasonic, terrible.
Until you get to shoot with a production model and adjusted settings, how can you really say all these things are definitive from this video. The things you're saying sound more like subjective personal taste than actual real objective critiques. I think too many are ready to jump on this camera and not like it. I'd have to see the 2 cameras shoot the same scene before i'd say that the GH3 definitely is a step backwards. We won't get that chance for a while yet.
#15
Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:06 AM
[edit: yes, I see others noticed this too.]
#16
Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:37 AM
-Highlights blown out on the juggler's shirt
- Mixed color grading on the juggler's face? I noticed the same 'yellow' cast on the face tones of the heroine in Genesis. Is this a characteristic of this camera's CLUT ??
- Loved the slo-mo!
If Panasonic take your advice to heart and make those fixes on released firmware, price drop on the kit with the 12-35... I might be willing to overlook the potential edge detail issues. After all, they are nothing a filter can't solve.
did you shot any stills??
#17
Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:41 AM
- Grant Ellis likes this
#18
Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:53 AM
I'd happily pay more for this camera to be better considering the competition.
Nice shootin, testing of the DOF, slow mo was cool, close ups on Pocahontas to check skin tone wud have been nice ;-)
#19
Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:02 AM
#20
Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:38 AM
- zephyrnoid likes this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












