Jasonlam

This has been asked a lot since the a6300 has come out and many has been explained the advantages of the a7sii but for me I don't really need the extra features of the a7sii, so I don't know if I should get the a6300 or the a7sii? I should music video of myself playing piano indoor, and these are the things that I DON'T need from the a7sii in this situation: IBIS- The camera does not move at all A bit better rolling shutter- save as above Headphone Jack- Will record externally Crazy low light- obviously I won't be shooting in the dark (however I wonder if the cleaner image at same ISO is worth getting) So if you take those away it pretty much is the same as the a6300 despite the full frame, which leads me to the next point: Will the full frame image be way cleaner than the a6300? (note that I have to shoot in 30p mode too). I'm wondering if the supposedly lesser noise in the a7sii is worth the £1100 difference? One thing I've been really unsatisfied about my pass cameras is that they're very noisy (been using the G7), often had to shoot above 1000 ISO. So obviously with the a7sii I don't need to worry about the ISO but would it be overkill, would the a6300 be fine? Even with the a6300 and a speedbooster its still way cheaper than the a7sii alone. So should I get the a7sii or will the a6300 do? I've been using the Panasonic G7 and the dynamic range is real bad indoor (lit with sun light), as you know the piano keys are white and reflective so I always keep that below clipping, but by doing that the shadows are all crushed and noisy. Plus the fact that I need to set my aperture around f/4 to let more of the keys in focus so I'm forced to use higher iso. Many thanks!