Cristian Salmistraro

Have you shoot the music video on your site with a Sony camera? I've problems understanding the importance of the bitrate. I know Canon cameras have a higher bitrate compared to Nikon, but the D750 seems also very good despite its lower output. Then it comes the Sony a7II with the XAVC S codec at 50 Mbps and I can't see a real difference. So, what's really important, at the beginning (about technical specs), to have a good image quality? I mainly shoot for web and youtube, but I want a decent image quality, without horribles artifacts. I already know the differences about lenses etc from a brand to other because I came from photography; it's only a technical question. I'm really sorry about my ignorance, but internet he's driving me crazy. Thank you for your patience

After that, now I'm considering to buy an old pro FX DSLR for shooting photographs and a camera for video. From what depends video quality? From bitrate or compression? This is my main question. Why Canon, Panasonic or Sony have better image quality? Maybe a camcorder around 1000 dollars can do it better? Mainly, I want to shoot music videos. Sorry, I am full of questions and quite confused about technical aspects.

I was considering a new photo/video equipment, but I'm stuck between Canon or Nikon for a simple reason: video quality. Last year I made lots of videos and works with my D7100 and I was going to choose the new D750, but I can't find true informations and data about its video quality. Some say that in HQ mode can do 45 Mbps, some 28 Mbps. I need a good internal quality for videos, not from the external hdmi output. Can Canon do it better? I was considering the 6D. The 5D Mk III is better? Can anyone help me with true informations? Thank you very much and sorry for bad english.