Opinion question: I *just* received my BMCC 2.5K RAW camera last week. I've barely shot with it.
Do I send it back, and wait patiently (again) for the BMPC 4K camera? I can live without 1 stop of DR, I think, in exchange for 4K + global shutter.
Already, I can see that I'm not 100% happy with this small sensor or the 2.5K resolution. I mean, it looks great for a "video camera", but I do a lot of outdoor, scenic landscape work, and I'm a time-lapse specialist... so my outdoor images need to be as razor-sharp and as crisp as possible. It's also nearly impossible to get wide shots, even with an 11-16mm Tokina.
Any camera, with good lighting, can make an interview setup look nice. I wanted a "film" camera that would be good for my outdoor, nature type work.
My initial feeling is that the Tokina 11-16mm doesn't focus properly with the BMCC at infinity. I would like to do more testing with other wide lenses.
But if I don't have to make a film right this minute... I'm wondering if I'd be wise to return the 2.5 camera and go with either of the new models. Or, maybe get a landscape DSLR camera plus a Pocket Cinema Camera.
I probably won't make a real decision until I rent a different, wide (8mm) lens and test out the image with proper focus.
Anybody want to purchase a gently used, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8?