userage

Dafuq, are they all exposed/graded properly? The 5D's colour stands out like crazy, the Kineraw and BM are pretty evenly matched though

Imagine RAW on the the GH2 ;)

I don't think you should be shooting a wedding..

Sorry whats the question? Are you asking is the GH3 good for stills? In which case yes. Even the GH2 was. It depends on your needs though, but the GH3 looks like an awesome body.

  Why would you want MJEG...

Maybe because its slower than the 60D, that way if they can get it working on the 600D it will most definitely work on 60D because they also use same processor?

  Possibly, I believe the Canons don't actually resolve 1080 lines in h264 anyway so it probably will be better.   +   I highly doubt that, from my understanding they got RAW by simply managing to get a stills burst mode at a lower resolution. That is a far cry from implementing a different codec on the camera.

Wow I didn't even know about Lens Turbo.. At half the price who is going to get the Metabones? They should put an aperture adjustment lever for the MFT adapters though so we can use AF lenses.

' The 50mm, 35mm and 90mm cost 300 euros altogether.' WHERE DID YOU GET THEM THAT CHEAP? D:

I thought it was worth sharing, GH2 still resolving a bit more detail there but its more or less on par with the MK III RAW   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFBc7i1Q_0w  

Looking to buy a new camera, is there a chance this will come to the lower Canons? 550d/60d/7d ? Or shall I just go for a GH2/G6

Well I spoke too soon.   http://nofilmschool.com/2013/05/1080p-raw-video-canon-5d-mark-iii-anamorphic/#more-53850   Now if only I could afford a 5D MK III.. Never realized just how far apart they have torn the firmware..

I think it could easily rival the C100/300, although ProRes would be better for most people.   Plus I don't know if they can get 1920x1080 RAW, that might simply be too much for the buffer, I don't think everyone wants to shoot 2.35:1. Although the detail resolved is very good, they could do 1663x940 (which the buffer can handle) and simply scale it up to 1080 and I'm sure the detail would still be better than stock.

Would you guys say the 1.86x crop of the GH2 is a big advantage over the G6? I can't decide whether to get the G6 or GH2. I know the G6 has a lot of other advantages like screen/vf etc..

No Pentax on that graph? They too wipe the floor with Canon :p