Jump to content

Subforums

  1. LATEST BLOG POSTS

    Latest articles from EOSHD.com

  2. EOSHD YOUTUBE

    Follow Andrew Reid on YouTube

16,711 topics in this forum

  1. Lenses 1 2 3 4 283

    • 5.7k replies
    • 1.2m views
  2. Panasonic GH6 1 2 3 4 88

    • 1.7k replies
    • 340.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 6.8k views
    • 11 replies
    • 305 views
    • 210 replies
    • 18.3k views
    • 58 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 472 replies
    • 119.8k views
  3. E-Mount Zooms

    • 4 replies
    • 218 views
  4. M43 Speedboster BMCC

    • 4 replies
    • 243 views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 16 replies
    • 910 views
    • 220 replies
    • 9.8k views
    • 32 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 4 replies
    • 247 views
    • 9 replies
    • 768 views
    • 50 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 4 replies
    • 667 views
    • 23 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 98 replies
    • 7.2k views
  5. Take the red pill...

    • 8 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 64 replies
    • 21.7k views
    • 10 replies
    • 516 views
    • 14 replies
    • 5.3k views
    • 46 replies
    • 6k views
    • 35 replies
    • 3.9k views
    • 12 replies
    • 879 views
    • 10 replies
    • 745 views
    • 144 replies
    • 26.9k views
    • 13 replies
    • 4.7k views
    • 1k replies
    • 117.6k views
    • 9 replies
    • 684 views
    • 110 replies
    • 15.5k views
    • 18 replies
    • 5.3k views
    • 39 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 76 replies
    • 11.1k views
    • 16 replies
    • 4.4k views
    • 6 replies
    • 687 views
    • 4 replies
    • 709 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 208 replies
    • 70.4k views
  • Popular Contributors

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      16.7k
    • Total Posts
      337.7k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      33,399
    • Most Online
      19,591

    Newest Member
    The Owlet Room
    Joined
  • Posts

    • Yes, that’s fair enough and should there be a situation where there was some provenance or personal connection, I would also make an exception. ’My’ experience was monthly updates of a company swanning around the world, asking for evermore amounts of cash for increased swanning. Until they pulled the plug and refused to allow anything or anyone else to carry out the project 🤨
    • I’ve just had some ‘slippage’ myself and ordered the latest version of the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 to complete what will now be a triumvirate of E Mount lenses adapted to my Nikon Z cameras. That is: 20-40, 28-75 and 70-180. Several options available at the wider end but 20 and 40 are two ‘perfect’ focal lengths for me and with all my zooms, this is how I use them, - as a twin prime set up with a single turn rather than needing to change a lens. The 70-180 at a touch over 900g, is the only ‘70-200’ in full frame under 1kg with the other options being approx 1250-1500g, plus physically much larger, so for me, the best long lens available. The 28-75 is an easy pick for me over any of the more trad 24-70’s, all of which are larger and heavier, plus 24mm is a meh focal length to me and though it’s only 5mm, longer is better. The only other viable option is the Sigma 28-70mm which is slightly smaller and lighter still, but zooms in the other direction so doesn’t fit with those other bookend zooms. Finally, being E Mount, I can use them adapted on Z or should things ever change into a Sony body direction, I already have the glass. And then there is the 35-150mm f2-2.8 I have not got one and have zero intention of doing so but if I needed a ‘one and done’, this would be it, my point being that for my needs, Tamron is in a league of one when it comes to lenses so I have been building my next gen system around them. And yes, I am aware that it has just been announced that the Tamron 28-75mm G2 is shortly arriving in Z Mount, but as above, I have more options down the road with E Mount. Plus I’m not paying the Nikon lens tax!
    • For me, my willingness to use kickstarter is perversely whether or not the company already has a track record of delivering quality products successfully, either through kickstarter or through other platforms.  Like recently, I backed a 4x10 film camera being made by a guy who has been selling a well-regarded line of pinhole cameras for years.  I'm very confident that it will ship eventually.  I've thankfully only been burnt a couple of times on pretty small things for products that never delivered...  products that delivered and were awful?  That's another story. Anyway, as I said, my interest in it, if I have any at all after it's released, would be as something I can mount on the back of a telephoto lens - or as something that can turn a pretty normal portrait lens into a long telephoto.  Could be nice for travel where (at present) a long lens (200mm+) is a big and heavy thing that I often leave home.
    • I think this is about the sum of it, at least from the ‘quality’ side of things. I think raw only came to iPhone with the 12, but could be wrong and for me as someone who only shoots raw, probably part of my personal ‘disconnect’ from photography using my phone as in I have not been using it’s full potential. Also, whilst I don’t need to be in ‘full on pro mode’ all the time (when not actually working), I probably need to get out of ‘point & click phone mode’ when using my phone and use it more like a camera. If that makes sense? Something I probably need to explore…    
    • My friend takes stills of his family holidays and has an ancient relic (IIRC it's a Canon 30D?) that he would always take with him.  He is a minimalist and was sick of hauling it around so did his first overseas trip without it and used his iPhone 5 (current at the time).  He took a bunch of photos on the trip, but when I asked him about it his thinking wasn't clear.  On his next trip he took an updated iPhone (maybe an 8?) and took lots of photos again, but still didn't have clear thinking about it. It was only several years later that he had a good reply, he said "The photos look fine but I realised that I never felt compelled to print and hang any of the photos from it".  He still can't define what it is, but something is missing for him.  I've looked at the prints he's got hanging in his house and the difference isn't obvious - it's not like his prints have shallow DOF or anything, they just have this timeless sort of look about them, and his iPhone pics all look like iPhone pics (unsurprisingly). Even the RAW stills from my GF3 from 2011 don't look like iPhone pics, even the current ones.  It might be a matter of blurring the iPhone images a bit, and toning down the strong saturation and contrast, who knows, but maybe they'll get over that hurdle soon.  Maybe they already have - I still have an iPhone 12 mini and don't use the stills in my creative work. TBH it's probably the "everything is awesome!!" processing that Apple do to their images.  Maybe the RAW images off the sensor are fine.
×
×
  • Create New...