Subforums
16,725 topics in this forum
-
- 5.7k replies
- 1.2m views
-
- 1.7k replies
- 347.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 7k views
-
- 1k replies
- 123.3k views
-
- 41 replies
- 754 views
-
- 327 replies
- 72.4k views
-
- 39 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 17 replies
- 345 views
-
- 40 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 417 views
-
- 0 replies
- 72 views
-
- 235 replies
- 14.9k views
-
- 52 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 163 views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 53 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 442 replies
- 31.1k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 890 views
-
- 78 replies
- 13.4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 5k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 473 replies
- 123.8k views
-
- 55 replies
- 9.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 461 views
-
- 0 replies
- 174 views
-
- 19 replies
- 856 views
-
- 10 replies
- 975 views
-
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
- 23 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 216 replies
- 23.7k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 36 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 66 replies
- 24.5k views
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics16.7k
-
Total Posts338k
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Posts
-
By Llaasseerr · Posted
I had a chance to test this, it does look like the extra green shadow noise introduced by the new autofocus is somewhat reduced by shooting at the higher base ISO 4000 if the situation allows for it. So shooting with an ND could work. -
I read that clog2 has slightly more DR than clog3 but that in clog2 the NR is turned down/off and the shadows are way noisier than clog3. How do you guys see that trade-off? worth it? or would you have rather reduce noise in post. -
Below is an approximate comparison of transfer curve for various Log and Sony's three versions of HLG. From the Bolex PDF above: The three versions of HLG that Sony cameras support (from https://xtremestuff.net/sony-and-hybrid-log-gamma-hlg/ ) - HLG3 (upper curve) is the closest to the Rec. 2100 standard : A chart of various Log formats from https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64243940 (note the 3 EV spread in the high EV limit between the various curves). The highest DR curves look to be C-Log2, S-Log3 and V-Log - but of course they do that by being flatter in the important mid-range area i.e. fewer levels per EV, increasing the chance of banding if pushed too far in post. Note this chart is -10 to +10 EV vs. IRE 0 to 110%, the other two are -8 to +8 EV vs. 10-bit digital code values. -
you must be fun at parties 😉 - i'm not purchasing anything i enjoy discussing tech - i also play guitar and have been in bands - i enjoy discussing amp modeling but am not purchasing it. Don't get so butt hurt 😉 Looks good! Keep at it, man! makes sense when you decouple that from the original intent of the thread - minimal processing/grading or even SOOC. Great question! I don't know but there are appreciable differences which is logical when you factor the dynamic relationship between varying sensors and processors, to assume they produce the same image and tangentially discuss lighting and makeup is besides the point. There's a reason Canon was toted as the king of color for a long time, and Fuji for their stylized looks. That's fair - have you noticed a brand that is putting out improvements in these areas that's caught your attention in the current market?
-
I was thinking of using the Fuji X-H2S for a small project but I saw some video regarding IR pollution. Has anyone else encountered it?
-
